[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: COGEMA Says No to LNT
They haven't taken science into their own hands--they've only applied it
consistently with its results. What the parent company decides and does in
France has no impact on how they operate in the U.S. Sounds like someone's
ego is wounded. Maybe he should change his opinions. Good for COGEMA, but
then France has been the world leader in nuclear power application for a
long time.
Jack Earley
Radiological Engineer
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard F. Orthen [mailto:rorthen@EARTHSCIENCES.NET]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:19 AM
To: Radsafe BBS
Subject: COGEMA Says No to LNT
>From today's IEM news launch:
May 10, 2002 - IEER Press Release (05/07/02) - French company with US
contracts choosing its own science and radiation risk estimates - U.S.
Subsidiary Should Be Barred From Plutonium Work Pending Investigation of
Parent Company, New Study Recommends. COGEMA, the French nuclear giant,
which reprocesses more commercial plutonium in the world than any other
company, has taken the science of radiation protection into its own hands,
overriding official scientific bodies and regulations, a new report claims.
The report, COGEMA: Above the Law? Concerns about the French Parent Company
of a U.S. Corporation Set to Process Plutonium in South Carolina, was
released today by the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IEER)
and the Safe Energy Communication Council (SECC). COGEMA, Inc., a U.S.
subsidiary of COGEMA (Compagnie Générale des Matières Nucléaires), is part
of a consortium that is designing a plant to produce plutonium fuel from
U.S. weapon-grade plutonium at the Savannah River Site near Aiken, South
Carolina. The report found that COGEMA had arbitrarily established its own
threshold for radiological dose impact in Europe. Furthermore, the report
uncovered several instances of disregard by COGEMA of French nuclear waste
laws, prompting the law's author to declare that COGEMA was setting itself
"above the law." COGEMA is more than 85 percent owned by various French
government entities. "COGEMA has simply declared by fiat that there is a
threshold below which it will assume that radiation doses have 'zero
impact'," said Dr. Arjun Makhijani, president of IEER and a co-author of the
report. "This is an ominous and disturbing development. A company ought not
to be taking law and science into its own hands. U.S. and international
scientific bodies and regulatory authorities have repeatedly rejected the
idea of a threshold for radiation damage, most recently in 2002. COGEMA's
subsidiary should not be allowed to process plutonium in the United States
until it explicitly rejects the position of its parent company in a legally
binding declaration."
Rick Orthen
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/