[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NRC to Test Shipping Nuclear Canisters



Index:



NRC to Test Shipping Nuclear Canisters

Finland to build controversial new nuclear plant

U.S. orders more security at decommissioned nuke plants

Utility Agrees to Buy Reactor Head

Universe's Earliest Light Detected

=================================



NRC to Test Shipping Nuclear Canisters



WASHINGTON (AP) - The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct full-

scale tests of nuclear waste shipping canisters as part of the 

licensing review for the proposed Yucca Mountain repository in 

Nevada, commissioners said Thursday.

 

Opponents of the Yucca Mountain project have expressed concern about 

the testing of canisters because the NRC currently relies on computer 

modeling and tests on small-scale versions or containers to assure 

they will not be dangerously breached in an accident.

 

NRC Chairman Richard Meserve told a Senate hearing on Thursday that 

the computer modeling and limited tests ``are sufficient to assess 

the effects of an accident.''

 

``We have a great deal of confidence in this approach,'' Meserve 

separately wrote to Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., in a recent letter, 

calling the use of computer models and scale model testing a ``good 

engineering practice.''

 

Nevertheless, when pressed on the issue at the hearing, Meserve 

reiterated the NRC plans to ask Congress for money to conduct full-

scale tests of casks that would be used to ship tens of thousands of 

tons of reactor waste to the Yucca Mountain site if it is approved as 

the country's central radioactive waste storage facility.

 

Engineers at the Sandia National Laboratory likely would conduct the 

test, NRC officials said.

 

The transportation issue was the focus for the second straight day as 

the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee wrapped up hearings 

on whether to allow the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste project to 

proceed.

 

Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., committee chairman, has scheduled a June 

5 vote on a resolution to override Nevada's objections to the waste 

repository, 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas. The full Senate must 

approve the resolution by July 26, or the Yucca project will come to 

a halt.

 

Meserve testified that the Transportation Department will have the 

primary role in approving a transportation plan for the waste, now 

scattered at commercial reactors and federal nuclear sites in 39 

states.

 

But he said the NRC, which must issue construction and operating 

permits for the facility, will approve the canisters to be used for 

transport.

 

Separately, Energy Undersecretary Robert Card rejected criticism that 

the administration is pursuing approval for Yucca Mountain without a 

plan to get waste to the site.

 

``I would reject the notion that we don't have a (transportation) 

plan,'' Card told the committee. He said an environmental impact 

analysis includes potential routes and transportation options.

 

The Energy Department strongly favors shipping 90 percent of the 

waste by rail rather than the Interstate highway system. Using trucks 

would require about 2,200 shipments annually, while a rail proposal 

would reduce that to about 175, with trains carrying three large 

transport casks per shipment.

 

In separate testimony, Jim Hall, former chairman of the National 

Transportation Safety Board and now a consultant for the state of 

Nevada, said a transportation plan ought to be completed before 

Congress is asked to give the Yucca project its go-ahead.

 

Hall acknowledged that nuclear waste transport has had a clean safety 

record, but added that ``we're talking about volumes and distances 

never seen before'' and new concerns about terrorism.

 

Reid has been trying to convince fellow senators to block the project 

and keep the waste where it is.

 

On the Net:

 

Energy Committee: http://energy.senate.gov/

-----------------



Finland to build controversial new nuclear plant



HELSINKI, May 24 (Reuters) - Finland decided on Friday to build the 

first new nuclear reactor in Western Europe in more than a decade to 

meet rising energy demands despite bitter opposition from 

environmentalists.

 

Parliament backed by 107 votes to 92 the coalition government's 

controversial proposal to construct a fifth atomic reactor to 

guarantee long-term energy supplies, cut its dependence on Russia and 

meet greenhouse gas targets.

 

It will be the first such plant since 1991 when France authorised the 

construction of a new reactor.

 

The Green Party said it may quit the ruling coalition following the 

vote, but Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen does not need its support to 

survive.

 

"This will enable us best to fulfil our climate policy objectives and 

secure the domestic energy supply and avoid excessive dependence on 

imports," Lipponen told Reuters.

 

The pro-nuclear lobby said it would spur other west European 

countries, like Britain, which are lagging behind eastern Europe and 

Asia in expanding nuclear power.

 

"Many countries around the world are already taking this path and 

many more are sure to follow," said John Ritch, director-general at 

the World Nuclear Association.

 

Ever since the deadly 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power station explosion 

many governments have moved to seek alternative energy sources like 

hydro-electric power or natural gas.

 

The vote comes almost 30 years after the last reactor was ordered in 

Finland, which has no oil or natural gas of its own.

 

The anti-nuclear lobby said construction of the plant ignored health 

and security risks, which were even more relevant following the 

September 11 attacks on New York and Washington.

 

"This is a decision not only against the environment but a decision 

against Finland," said Tobias Muenchmeyer, nuclear expert at 

Greenpeace International. "It is unsafe."

 

The European Union repeated the decision on nuclear energy was up to 

each member country.

 

"The range of choices in member states must be as wide as possible 

and I believe that the nuclear option must remain open," EU Energy 

Commissioner Loyola de Palacio in a statement.

 

But the bloc's top environment official said the decision did not 

signal the start of a new trend.

 

European Environment Commissioner Margot Wallstrom also said it was 

not necessary for EU member states to increase use of nuclear power 

to meet their goals under the Kyoto treaty against global warming.

 

"I have a personal view on nuclear (power) but this is their choice," 

Wallstrom, who has in the past made clear her dislike for nuclear 

power, told Reuters during an EU environment ministers' meeting in 

Spain.

 

CUT RELIANCE ON RUSSIA

 

The Finnish government says it needs the reactor to ensure economic 

growth continues, meet Kyoto targets and cut its dependence on 

Russia, which provides most of its imported energy.

 

Two thirds is imported and was worth more than 4.5 billion euros 

($4.14 billion) in 2000. Sweden and Norway are less reliant on 

imports.

 

Under the 1997 Kyoto pact, rich nations aim to cut gas emissions 

blamed for global warming, including carbon dioxide.

 

Nuclear energy produces no greenhouse gas emissions but the issue of 

nuclear waste disposal often worries opponents.

 

Parliament's decision passed largely unnoticed in Helsinki, with only 

around 100 demonstrators outside parliament compared to more than 

5,000 during an anti-nuclear protest last month.

 

Environment Minister Satu Hassi, a Green, has hit out against the 

government for raising the Cold War spectre of the nation's need to 

lessen dependence on Russia.

 

Nuclear power producer Teollisuuden Voima Oy, controlled by Finnish 

industry, is expected to spend up to 2.5 billion euros to build the 

reactor. The plant is expected to be operational before the end of 

the decade.

 

The United States is the biggest nuclear energy producer in absolute 

terms with France second and Japan third, said Ritch.

 

No commercial nuclear power plant has been ordered in the United 

States since the 1979 Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania, 

where there was a partial reactor core meltdown.

 

"You can confidently expect a new nuclear construction in the United 

States within the next five years," Ritch said.

-----------------



U.S. orders more security at decommissioned nuke plants



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In response to general terror threats against 

the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Friday 

ordered extra security measures to protect spent fuel stored in water-

filled pools at U.S.     commercial nuclear power plants that are 

being decommissioned.

 

Military experts are worried that terror groups may try to wrap such 

radioactive material around so-called "dirty" bombs, which when 

exploded could contaminate a large area in a city.

 

The NRC said its order also applied to General Electric's (GE.N) 

nuclear fuel storage facility in Morris, Illinois, which was issued 

an operating permit by the agency in 1967.

 

Some of the requirements formalize security measures the NRC called 

for after the Sept. 11 attacks, but additional safety steps have been 

ordered following a comprehensive security review by the agency.

 

"The commission views these compensatory measures as prudent, interim 

steps to address the current threat environment in a consistent 

manner," the agency said.

 

The NRC said it would not specifically identify what extra security 

measures plants will have to take, but generally they involve 

increased patrols, installation of additional physical barriers to 

plants, vehicle checks farther from the facilities and better 

coordination between plant security and law enforcement and military 

authorities.

 

Many of the security enhancements are already in place, but licensees 

must start implementing any remaining steps within six months. 

Licensed plant operators must give the NRC their schedules within 20 

days for implementing the security measures.

 

After a nuclear power plant is closed and removed from service, it 

must be decommissioned.

 

This involves removal and disposal of radioactive components and 

materials, such as the reactor and associated piping, and the cleanup 

of radioactive or hazardous contamination that may remain in the 

buildings and on the site.

 

Enhanced security will required at rectors already decommissioned, 

including the 849-megawatt Shoreham plant in New York and the Fort 

St. Vrain facility in Colorado.

 

There are also 17 power reactors either in or entering the 

decommissioning phase, according to the Nuclear Energy Institute.

 

The plants are: Dresden 1, Illinois; Fermi 1, Michigan; Humboldt Bay, 

California; Indian Point 1, New York; LaCrosse, Wisconsin; Millstone 

1, Connecticut; Peach Bottom 1 and Three Mile Island 2, Pennsylvania; 

and Zion 1 and 2, Illinois.

 

Other plants are: Connecticut Yankee, Connecticut; Rancho Seco and 

San Onofre, California; Saxton, Pennsylvania; Yankee Rowe, 

Massachusetts; Trojan, Oregon; and Big Rock Point, Michigan.

-----------------



Utility Agrees to Buy Reactor Head



AKRON, Ohio (AP) - The owner of the Davis-Besse nuclear plant on 

Thursday said it would replace a 6-inch-thick reactor head that 

was eaten nearly all the way through by acid.

 

FirstEnergy Corp. had considered repairing the existing reactor head 

at the 25-year-old plant in Oak Harbor, about 20 miles east of 

Toledo. Federal regulators, however, said replacement was a better 

option.

 

``Based on our analysis, replacing the head is our preferred 

option,'' said the utility's Lew W. Myers, who is overseeing the 

project.

 

Replacement is expected to cost as much as $75 million, including the 

price of the unused reactor head from an unfinished nuclear 

plant in Midland, Mich.

 

The Davis-Besse plant was shut down in February after inspectors 

found the hole in the steel reactor vessel cap enclosing the 

reactor's core. The rust was caused by a buildup of boric acid from 

reactor cooling water that had been leaking from nozzle cracks 

since the mid-1990s.

 

Only a thin noncorrosive stainless steel membrane kept the hole from 

bursting open.

 

It was the most extensive corrosion ever found atop a U.S. nuclear 

plant reactor. The discovery prompted inspectors to order an 

industrywide review of U.S. plants with similar designs.

 

On the Net:

 

http://www.firstenergycorp.com/ir

----------------



Universe's Earliest Light Detected



WASHINGTON (AP) - Scientists analyzing tiny variations in the sky's 

background radiation have detected the earliest light emitted 

at the formation of the universe.

 

The detailed new images show indications first bits of matter that 

would evolve into the stars and planets that exist today.

 

``We have seen, for the first time, the seeds that gave rise to 

clusters of galaxies, thus putting theories of galaxy formation on a 

firm 

observational footing,'' said team leader Anthony Readhead of the 

California Institute of Technology.

 

``These unique high-resolution observations provide a new set of 

critical tests of cosmology,'' he said.

 

The research, detailed Thursday at a National Science Foundation 

briefing, was conducted using the Cosmic Background Imager, a 

set of 13 radio antennas located high in the Atacama Desert of Chile.

 

The instruments were able to detect minute variations in the cosmic 

microwave background, the radiation that has traveled to Earth 

over almost 14 billion years.

 

According to the researchers the fluctuations are indications of 

those first tentative seeds of matter and energy.

 

They added that the measurements provide evidence to support the 

theory of inflation, which states that the universe underwent a 

violent expansion in its first micro-moments. After about 300,000 

years it cooled enough to allow the matter to form.

 

On Friday, a team of European physicists reported similar findings 

based on new high-precision observations using a radio telescope 

called the Very Small Array located on the island of Tenerife in the 

Atlantic Ocean.

 

The images show the beginnings of the formation of structure in the 

early universe, according to the researchers from the Universities 

of Cambridge and Manchester and the Instituto de Astrofisica de 

Canarias in Tenerife.

 

The team said that because galaxies must have formed out of the 

primeval fireball, they should have left imprints in the radiation in 

the form of tiny variations in temperature.

 

According to the National Science Foundation, the data collected in 

Chile is also helping scientists learn more about a repulsive 

force called ``dark energy'' that appears to defy gravity and cause 

the universe to accelerate at an ever-increasing pace.

 

``Each new image of the early universe refines our model of how it 

all began. Just as the universe grows and spreads, humankind's 

knowledge of our own origins continues to expand,'' commented NSF 

Director Rita Colwell.

 

The Science Foundation described the cosmic microwave background as a 

record of the first photons that escaped from the rapidly cooling, 

coalescing universe about 300,000 years after the explosion known as 

the Big Bang that is commonly believed to have given birth to the 

universe.

 

On the Net:

 

National Science Foundation: 

http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/advance/pr0241-images.htm



-------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle

Director, Technical

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100  Extension 2306

Fax:(714) 668-3149



E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net

E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com



Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/