[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Lawmakers Question Nuke Cleanup Plan
Index:
Lawmakers Question Nuke Cleanup Plan
Belgium split by U.S. plutonium recycling bid
Portugal police arrest man for uranium smuggling
Entergy may drop Vermont nuclear power plant buy
Preparing ``America'' for a Nuclear Emergency Campaign Launched
========================================
Lawmakers Question Nuke Cleanup Plan
WASHINGTON (AP) - Senators and several state officials said Thursday
they fear an Energy Department attempt to speed the cleanup of waste
from decades of nuclear weapons production may leave the sites still
contaminated.
The Bush administration, in an attempt to accelerate and cut the cost
of such cleanups, announced earlier this year it would give
preference in distributing money to locations that agree to commit to
a quicker cleanup.
Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham wants to use $800 million of the
$6.7 billion annual cleanup budget as incentive for these accelerated
programs. Critics have voiced concern that while some facilities will
get more money, others will see money syphoned away.
But at a Senate hearing Thursday, state officials from Washington,
New Mexico and Idaho expressed another worry: That the incentive to
push for faster cleanup may leave some sites less clean in violation
of long-standing agreements with state and local authorities.
``It's not cleanup to leave waste behind,'' Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.,
told Energy Department officials at a hearing by the Senate Energy
and Natural Resources Committee on the plan.
Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., the panel's chairman, said the
administration approach ``could be viewed as an incentive to
encourage state regulators to relax site cleanup standards.''
Jesse Roberson, the DOE's assistant secretary for environmental
management, testified that the new approach is an effort to give
priority to the most high-risk environmental problems and deal with
them faster and at less cost.
``It's not our intent to avoid compliance with any of our regulatory
agreements,'' said Roberson.
Nowhere is the waste problem more challenging than the Energy
Department's Hanford reservation in central Washington state, where
there are 177 underground tanks - some of them with an unknown mix of
radioactive material and leaking - threatening to contaminate the
nearby Columbia River.
About half of the special $800 million fund has been earmarked for
Hanford.
But Christine Gregoire, Washington state's attorney general, told the
committee she is concerned that along with a speedier cleanup, the
Energy Department will renege on past promises to remove from the
site at least 99 percent of the tank waste.
``We want it all out,'' she said.
Despite DOE assurances, Gregoire said there have been ominous signs
that under the accelerated cleanup plan the department will
reclassify some of the tank waste as something less than ``high
level'' waste, meaning they will not have to remove it.
She said the DOE also has decided to build only one, instead of two,
plants to solidify the waste in glass, suggesting the department may
now be planning to remove less waste.
Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., tried to press Roberson on the issue,
asking that she give assurances that 99 percent of the waste in the
Hanford tanks be removed and that wastes not be reclassified.
``We have a commitment to move as much waste as feasible,'' said
Roberson, refusing to be pinned down on a percentage.
Kathleen Trever of the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality,
also expressed concern about whether the program will mean more
pollution being left behind at the DOE's Idaho National Engineering
Laboratory.
Peter Maggiore, head of New Mexico's environment department, said the
program will mean more money for cleanup at the Sandia and Los Alamos
weapons research labs. While he said he doesn't think it will mean
less cleanup at those two sites, Maggiore acknowledged some
uncertainty.
``It is imperative that accelerated cleanup not be interpreted to
mean less cleanup,'' he testified.
An environmental group, the Natural Resources Defense Council, is
arguing before a federal court in Idaho that the Energy Department
plans to reclassify waste now held in tanks not only at Hanford, but
at the Idaho facility and at the Savannah River complex in South
Carolina.
Geoff Fettus, an NRDC attorney, said the suit charges that such a
reclassification would violate federal law because this waste comes
from nuclear reprocessing in past weapons production and therefore
must be treated as high level waste. Under the law, any high level
waste must be put into a deep geological repository, presumably the
Yucca Mountain facility in Nevada that has yet to be built.
-------------------
Belgium split by U.S. plutonium recycling bid
BRUSSELS, July 12 (Reuters) - A U.S. request to Belgium to recycle
weapons-grade plutonium under an arms reduction treaty split the
country's coalition government on Friday.
President George W. Bush's administration has asked Belgium to
recycle 80 kg (176 lbs) of the highly fissile material into low-grade
nuclear fuel under a deal with Russia to reduce each side's deployed
strategic nuclear warheads to between 1,700 and 2,200 from about
6,000.
Belgium and France have the technology to convert nuclear weapons-
grade material into MOX fuel that can be used in civilian nuclear
power plants, while the United States does not.
Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt, who heads a three-party coalition of
his centre-right Liberals, the Socialists and environmentalist
Greens, supports the request but the Greens wrote to him last month
urging him to reject the request.
The row has been conducted in an exchange of letters thus far but a
government spokesman said the cabinet would discuss the issue on
Friday. He declined further comment.
A U.S. embassy spokesman said Washington planned to licence the
technology to build two similar plants in the United States, but it
first wanted to ship a small amount of plutonium to Belgium or France
to simulate the procedure in a test facility.
"The only thing that would come, would be a test amount to build the
test assemblies, process them, send them back to the U.S., run them
through a plant and say here's what we get, here's how much it costs,
here's what the process would be if we build this plant and here's
what we get as a result," Joseph MacManus told Reuters. "That's the
whole package right there."
DISARMAMENT ROLE FOR BELGIUM
MOX combines plutonium and uranium oxide recycled from spent nuclear
fuel.
In a letter obtained by Reuters, Verhofstadt responded to the Greens
by saying Belgium should play a part in disarmament.
"Belgium's agreement in principle would constitute an important
signal that our country is prepared to contribute to the
international nuclear disarmament programme, reducing the current non-
proliferation risk and the problems involving the physical protection
of nuclear material," he wrote.
Verhofstadt said Washington was considering recycling the plutonium
at Belgonucleaire, a Belgian subsidiary of French state nuclear
reprocessing firm Cogema, or at a plant in France.
It would take the United States several years to build its own MOX
plant and Belgian approval of the U.S. request would speed up the
destruction of weapons-grade plutonium by four years, Verhofstadt
said.
The Greens advocated storing the plutonium underground in the United
States. Shipping it to Belgium for recycling would create transport
risks and went against the government's decision last year to phase
out nuclear power, they argued.
-----------------
Portugal police arrest man for uranium smuggling
LISBON, July 12 (Reuters) - Portuguese police have arrested a man on
charges of belonging to an international ring smuggling enriched
uranium, which could be used to make nuclear weapons.
A statement said that the 46-year-old man was arrested on Thursday
following an investigation undertaken at the request of French
authorities, who were tracking a criminal organisation suspected of
smuggling nuclear material from eastern Europe.
"Three other resident foreign individuals had already been arrested
in France, in summer 2001, from whom a portion of enriched uranium
was confiscated, which could possibly be suited to the production of
a nuclear weapon or a terrorist device," the statement said.
"Countless investigative efforts by the police ... have gathered many
signs that the Portuguese citizen was involved and even had a leading
role, in the same (international) ring," Judiciary Police added in
Portugal's second city, Oporto.
----------------
Entergy may drop Vermont nuclear power plant buy
NEW ORLEANS, July 12 (Reuters) - Entergy Corp., an electricity and
natural gas company, said on Friday it may not complete its
$180 million purchase of a Vermont nuclear power plant because of
terms set by state regulators.
The company, the second-largest U.S. operator of nuclear plants
behind Exelon, said the Vermont Public Service Board said on
June 13 that Entergy cannot keep any excess decommissioning funds,
money set aside to pay for the dismantling of old nuclear
plants.
Instead, Entergy said the board is requiring it to pay any such funds
to the seller -- eight New England-based utilities -- for the
benefit of their ratepayers. The largest of the sellers are Central
Vermont Public Service Corp., New England Power Co., Green
Mountain Power Corp. and Connecticut Light and Power Co.
Entergy said the board on Thursday denied its request for an
amendment of the June 13 order, which approved the acquisition of the
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station.
The company said that an earlier agreement with the sellers and the
Department of Public Service called for it to retain any excess
funds if the plant were decommissioned before 2022. Entergy and the
sellers would share the funds equally if the plant were
decommissioned after 2022.
Regardless of whether it buys the plant, Entergy said it expects to
achieve 2002 and 2003 earnings to meet its previous forecasts.
The company has said it expects to earn $3.40 to $3.60 a share for
2002 and $3.75 to $3.95 for 2003, up from $3.23 for 2001.
------------------
Preparing ``America'' for a Nuclear Emergency Campaign Launched by
Anbex Distributing
PALM HARBOR, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 11, 2002--Anbex
Distributing, based in Palm Harbor, Florida, announced today their
public awareness campaign to prepare American citizens from the
harmful effects of radioactive fallout in a nuclear radiation
emergency.
Anbex, Inc. is certified by the U.S. Government to manufacture IOSAT
brand, Potassium Iodide (symbol:KI), and is authorized by
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to market the anti-radiation
pills to the public. Anbex's IOSAT, is the FDA approved over-the-
counter, anti-radiation pill. No prescription is needed.
Visit: http://www.anbexdistributing.com for more information.
The U.S. Government has identified 104 domestic nuclear power plants
as targets for terrorist attacks. Over 200 million Americans,
more than 85% of the population of United States, live within 200
miles of a nuclear power plant.
Education, knowledge and preparedness are the principles which
support the campaign "Preparing America for a Nuclear
Emergency."
The number one cause of death from the exposure to nuclear radiation
is thyroid cancer. Anbex's FDA approved IOSAT brand,
Potassium Iodide (KI) acts as a radiation block to protect the health
of people exposed to radioactive fallout, whether inhaled or
ingested in contaminated food or water.
The U.S. Government agency, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
has already purchased over nine million pills for
distribution to several states with nuclear power plants.
Government agencies, military personnel, police and fire departments,
emergency workers, retailers, corporations, schools, hospitals,
charitable organizations, summer camps, and all American families
should be prepared in the event of a nuclear emergency. Every
American should have a personal supply of Anbex's IOSAT anti-
radiation pills in their homes, offices, and cars and include their
personal supply in their evacuation, emergency and travel plans.
Anbex's IOSAT comes in FDA approved, individual, foil-sealed packages
with a 14-day supply per person and retails for about $1.00
-------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle
Director, Technical
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100 Extension 2306
Fax:(714) 668-3149
E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/