[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
U.S. reactor repairs seen topping $1 billion
Index:
U.S. reactor repairs seen topping $1 billion
Fires, water leakage occur at Tsuruga reactor
IAEA to inspect Iran nuclear facilities in February
N.Korea tells IAEA to unseal nuke plant-Kyodo
USNRC Chairman to Leave in March
===================================
U.S. reactor repairs seen topping $1 billion
NEW YORK, Dec 12 (Reuters) - What started earlier this year as a
couple of rust spots on a Midwest reactor lid has mushroomed into a
repair bill for the U.S. nuclear power industry that is likely to top
$1 billion.
FirstEnergy Corp. <FE.N> said it was surprised back in February when
it found cracks in the lid capping the reactor at its 925 megawatt
Davis-Besse plant in Oak Harbor, Ohio.
More surprising was the discovery of a hole in the 6-inch thick steel
lid, eaten by boric acid that had been leaking for years through tiny
cracks around the nozzles that guide fuel rods into the vessel that
contains the nuclear reaction.
Davis-Besse's pressurized water reactor uses the same basic design as
69 other U.S. nuclear reactors which together account for about 12
percent of the nation's power supply.
Following the startling discovery at Davis-Besse, the federal Nuclear
Regulatory Commission ordered special inspections at all of the
nation's pressurized water reactors to determine whether any other
vessel heads need to be pulled and replaced --a huge, costly job.
A Reuters survey of nuclear plant operators showed work is planned or
already under way to replace vessel heads on 17 reactors.
While not all companies were willing to discuss the cost of replacing
reactor vessel heads, those that did estimated the job would cost on
average $60 million per unit.
At that price, replacement costs for the 13 units including Davis-
Besse would add up to roughly $1.02 billion, and more vessel heads
may have to be swapped.
SOARING COSTS FROM DAVIS-BESSE
However, the replacement cost of the reactor head itself does not
include the biggest expense -- down time.
A shut nuclear unit can cost its owners nearly $500,000 a day buying
electricity it would have generated otherwise.
First Energy estimates the Davis-Besse outage is costing the company
$10 million to $15 million a month in replacement power, soaring to
$20 million a month in July and August when air conditioning pushes
up electricity demand.
With 10 months of down time since February, the replacement power
cost for Davis-Besse alone would average $140 million.
Because most utilities have regulated rates, they cannot
automatically pass the repair and replacement power costs on to
consumers without first winning regulatory approval.
"Basically our rates are capped in terms of what we can charge
customers," FirstEnergy spokesman Richard Wilkins said.
The owners of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania
have said they will replace the reactor lid in the autumn of 2003
because of the difficulty and high cost of removing insulation around
the head before inspection.
The $100 million cost of replacing the head at Three Mile Island, in
part, has prompted the plant's owner, AmerGen Energy Co., to consider
selling the reactor.
The head replacement process at Davis-Besse was nearly complete as of
early December.
Davis-Besse has been shut since February when the corrosion was
discovered, but the actual vessel head replacement took about 45 to
60 days, Wilkins said. Davis-Besse is expected to resume power
production in early 2003.
OVER TWO FEET OF CONCRETE
The replacement job is a formidable one.
An 18-by-18 foot hole has to be cut in the two-and-a-half foot thick
concrete wall of the containment building, and the old vessel head --
an 85-ton metal dome about 17 feet in diameter and eight feet tall --
has to be eased outside.
The new vessel head is moved into the building and the hole in the
containment building is closed and restored to its original technical
specifications.
The old vessel head is decontaminated and wrapped in a protective
shrink-wrap type material to be sent to a disposal facility in Utah
to be permanently buried.
FirstEnergy, for its Davis-Besse facility, was able to purchase a
replacement vessel head from another facility where construction had
begun on a nuclear reactor but was never completed.
-----------------
Fires, water leakage occur at Tsuruga reactor
TSURUGA, Japan, Dec. 13 (Kyodo) - A nuclear reactor at Tsuruga
Nuclear Power Station in Fukui Prefecture was shut down Thursday
night after fire repeatedly broke out from a turbine cover, station
operator Japan Atomic Power Co. said Friday.
The fire was soon brought under control, plant officials said.
Officials of the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said earlier
there was no sign of radiation leakage into the environment and there
are no safety concerns about the reactor itself.
But there appears to be no precedent for manually shutting down a
reactor because of a fire in the turbine area, they said.
The company also said an operator patrolling around the No. 2 reactor
at the station on Friday found a leakage of steam which does not
contain radiation from a feed-water heater in a turbine building.
The fire broke out from a heat insulating cover on the No. 2
reactor's high-pressure turbine at around 7:30 p.m. Thursday at the
plant in Tsuruga.
It was temporarily extinguished but broke out again, prompting
officials to manually shut down the reactor at 9 p.m.
The fire then re-ignited briefly at around 10 p.m. Thursday and 12:30
a.m. Friday, officials said.
Meanwhile, the Fukui police investigating the cause of the fires said
Friday they suspect they were caused by super-heated lubricants that
leaked from the axis of the turbine. The oil apparently seeped into
the insulating material of the turbine cover.
Japan Atomic Power officials said operators of the reactor found
lubricants spilled from the axis of the turbine Thursday afternoon
and the first fire broke out when employees were trying to remove the
cover of the turbine for inspection.
The lubricating oil is sent from a tank in the turbine building to 12
turbine axes through a pipe, utilizing air pressure balance by an
extractor. The oil circulates through the pipe to return to the tank,
the company said.
The air pressure balance was disrupted because the company had the
extractor repaired on Thursday and used a back up extractor. As a
result, the lubricating oil stopped circulating and overflowed from
nine of the 12 turbine axes, the police said.
The fire broke out after the oil was heated in the turbine cover as
the turbine is fed with 280 C steam, the police said.
The insulators in the turbine cover were made of fiberglass bags
filled with asbestos, the officials said.
------------------
IAEA to inspect Iran nuclear facilities in February
VIENNA, Dec 13 (Reuters) - The U.N. nuclear watchdog agency said on
Friday it was aware of new nuclear facilities under construction in
Iran, which U.S. officials said could be used to make weapons, and
planned to inspect them in February.
Iran invited the inspectors after informing the International Atomic
Energy Agency in September of an ambitious plan to build nuclear
power plants and related fuel facilities over the next 20 years, IAEA
spokesman Mark Gwozdecky said.
Gwozdecky said Iran did not specify details, including the purpose of
the two construction sites at issue in the dispute with the United
States, but invited the IAEA to send an inspection team headed by the
agency's director general Mohamed ElBaradei.
"The director general, with a team of technical experts, plans to
make such a visit in February 2003," Gwozdecky said.
"We don't jump to conclusions. We will visit shortly and determine
for ourselves what the facilities are," he told Reuters.
Iran on Friday dismissed U.S. accusations that two nuclear sites
under construction could be used to make a secret nuclear weapon.
"We don't have any hidden atomic activities. All our nuclear
activities are for non-military fields," Iranian government spokesman
Abdollah Ramazanzadeh told reporters on the sidelines of a political
conference in Tehran.
He was responding to remarks by U.S. officials that two nuclear
facilities near the central Iranian towns of Natanz and Arak, seen in
commercial satellite photographs, were of a type which suggested Iran
could use them to build a nuclear weapon.
Experts said even if the two new facilities turned out to be heavy
water and fuel enrichment plants, that could point to a nuclear power
programme just as well as to the development of nuclear wepaons.
"Even if they are heavy water and enrichment plants, Iran has a right
to these. It's just that at a certain point they would have to
declare them to the IAEA" for monitoring under the international
nuclear non-proliferation pact, one nuclear expert said.
Iran is party to the international nuclear arms non-proliferation
treaty and has an agreement with the IAEA to safeguard against the
diversion of civilian nuclear material for weapons.
"The IAEA has not detected any diversion of nuclear material (in
Iran) declared and placed under our safeguard," Gwozdecky said.
The Vienna-based agency has a mandate to ensure nuclear facilities
around the world are used solely for civilian purposes as well
as coordinating global nuclear power safety.
-----------------
N.Korea tells IAEA to unseal nuke plant-Kyodo
TOKYO, Dec 13 (Reuters) - North Korea has told the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) it wants the nuclear monitoring
body to unseal and remove surveillance cameras from a nuclear plant
at the centre of a suspected 1990s weapons programme,
Kyodo news agency reported on Friday.
The report, from Vienna, quoted IAEA director Mohamed ElBaradei as
saying the agency had received a letter from the communist
state making the demand.
Pyongyang said on Thursday that it would reactivate the nuclear
facility, raising the stakes in a standoff at the world's last Cold
War
flashpoint.
The decision to restart the reactor, mothballed in 1994 after an
international crisis over alleged production of weapons-grade
plutonium there, escalates a showdown with the United States over a
second nuclear programme being pursued by the isolated and
poor communist state.
Analysts have said Pyongyang's latest move -- which it said it had
been forced to take after a U.S.-led decision to suspend oil aid to
the country -- appeared to be a desperate attempt to force Washington
to the negotiating table.
In a statement from Vienna, Elbaradei called on Pyongyang to act with
restraint and refrain from any unilateral action that might
make it hard for the monitoring agency to keep tabs on those nuclear
materials subject to international safeguards.
"It is essential that the containment and surveillance measures which
are currently in place continue to be maintained," ElBaradei
said in the statement.
------------------
USNRC Chairman to Leave in March
WASHINGTON (AP) - Richard Meserve, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
chairman, said Thursday he will resign from the agency
at the end of March, more than a year before his term expires.
President Bush will nominate his replacement on the five-member
commission and name a new chairman. The nomination requires
Senate confirmation.
Meserve, selected for the post and made chairman by President Clinton
in 1999, said he will become president of the Carnegie
Institution, a prominent research center in Washington.
Meserve, a Democrat, leaves at a time when the agency is facing a
range of new challenges. They include protecting nuclear power
plants from terrorists and approving a proposed nuclear waste site at
Yucca Mountain in Nevada.
In remarks Thursday to agency staff, Meserve said he felt ``we have
responded effectively to the terrorists' challenge to our national
security.''
Meserve is one of three Democrats on the commission. Commissioner
Greta Joy Dicus, a Democrat, is expected to depart in June when her
term expires.
The other members of the commission are Republicans Jeffrey S.
Merrifield and Nils J. Diaz, and Democrat Edward McGaffigan Jr. By
law, only three commission members may be of the same party, so one
of Bush's nominees will have to be a Democrat.
-------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle
Director, Technical
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100 Extension 2306
Fax:(714) 668-3149
E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/