[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: hospital contamination incident

To: pottert@erols.com, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: Re: hospital contamination incident
From: BLHamrick@AOL.COM
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:29:06 EST
Reply-To: BLHamrick@AOL.COM
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

In a message dated 12/27/2002 7:57:17 PM Pacific Standard Time, pottert@erols.com writes:

. It seems that the NRC is focusing on one tree and ignoring the
forest. The real issue is not whether the nuclear medicine tech changed
her gloves before handling the package.

In my mind, the real issue is what were the consequences? How significant was the contamination? It's difficult to determine if this was even a reportable event.

Barbara

Prev by Date: Re: hospital contamination incident
Next by Date: Re: Not using LNT to calculate risk does not mean there is no risk.
Prev by thread: Re: hospital contamination incident
Next by thread: RE: Not using LNT to calculate risk does not mean there is no ri sk.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread