[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
LNT and medical X-rays
Heard a short news item on the radio this morning that the FDA is going to
consider whether or not to declare medical x-rays as a possible carcinogen.
The news note was very short and didn't explain the reasoning or
justification and certainly didn't delve into the consequences.
Personally, I believe such a designation could scare more people away from
clearly beneficial uses of radiation (simple x-rays) and will serve to
support lawsuits involving trivial exposure levels. ("Oh Doctor, you
didn't diagnose my cancer, you caused it. My attorney will be touch.")
I'm not convinced that low doses have a threshold, nor that they are
beneficial simply by stimulating the immune system. IMHO, it appears that
DNA damage from high LET radiation must be different (multiply damaged
sites) from that caused by oxydative metabolism (refer to Dr. John Ward's
work at UC San Diego). And if low LET radiation doesn't cause damage any
different than natural processes, how then can low level radiation exposure
stimulate the immune system (see Dan Billen's excellent paper on relative
damage rates)? The damage must either be different (to cause an effect) or
must be the same and at trivial levels. If low dose low LET radiation can
stimulate the immune system, why then can it not be responsible for
advancing carcinogenesis but at sufficiently low risk to be unimportant?
If there are competing processes (DNA damage and immune system
enhancement), there is probably even more that we don't yet understand
about the dynamics. I don't believe epidemiological studies will be able
to answer those questions.
Anyway, those of you with credentials and those in federal government
service should consider weighing in on the FDA proposal. It's taken
decades to convince many journalists and the public that low radiation
exposures (in the range of diagnostic x-rays) are safe (if nothing else,
consider the public dose limits in Part 20). Having the Government declare
those same x-rays as carcinogenic will undo what little understanding is
out there. And it'll be the wrong message and a misdirected focus.
Y'all have a good New Year.
Eric M. Goldin, Ph.D, CHP
<goldinem@songs.sce.com>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/