[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Medis bias
- To: Susan, L, Gawarecki
- Subject: Re: Medis bias
- From: BERNARD, L, COHEN
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:22:04 -0600
- CC: RADSAFE
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Susan L Gawarecki wrote:
> I've had some interesting discussions about reporting on nuclear issues
> with a reporter who covers the DOE beat for the local big city
> newspaper. He claims that he is not supposed to determine "the truth"
> nor is he qualified to. He also notes that his job is to report what
> people say on the various sides of an issue.
--The problem with this is that they give equal weight to
statements by Sternglass, Gofman, etc as to statements by distinguished
scientists. They ask how are they supposed to know who is more credible.
I always suggest to the Reporter that he telephone a few major
Universities of his choice, ask for a professor of Radiation Health (or
something related), and ask him the questions. I have made this suggestion
to many dozens of Reporters, but I know of no case where they have done
what I suggested.
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/