[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nuclear Medicine Patients and Homeland Security
I agree with Sandy and Jay remarks on this subject:
No doubt that roblems affecting protection and safety shall be promptly
identified in a manner commensurate with their importance and to receive the
attention appropriated by their significance.
Jose Julio Rozental
joseroze@netvision.net.il
Israel
----- Original Message -----
From: "MacLellan, Jay" <jay.maclellan@PNL.GOV>
To: <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 10:19 PM
Subject: RE: radsafe-digest V1 #985
> Bill,
>
> Enforcement would not come by requiring the patient to sign a piece of
> paper. Enforcement implies punishment for wrong-doing. I assume,
> therefore, that you are advocating fining the patient who doesn't follow
> the rules.
>
> Jay MacLellan
>
>
> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 11:58:18 -0500
> From: William V Lipton <liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM>
> Subject: Re: Nuclear Medicine Patients and Homeland Security
>
> As I stated in a previous posting, the patient instructions could be
> enforced through the general licensing provisions of current
> regulations. The patient would be granted a general license to receive
> the material under the conditions of this license. One of these
> conditions would be to follow the instructions provided by the
> administering specific licensee.
>
> Bill Lipton
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>
To: "John Jacobus" <crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>; <Radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>;
"Carol Marcus" <csmarcus@ucla.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: Nuclear Medicine Patients and Homeland Security
> On 30 Dec 2003 at 11:01, Carol Marcus wrote:
>
> > there is a large margin
> > of safety built into 35.75 that virtually assures that no member of
> > the public will get >500mrem (doing the calculations correctly, of
> > course, not doing bizarre NRC-style calculations that expand time,
> > shrink distance, and ignore shielding).
>
> Unless it's a homeless person who happens to be sleeping next to
> someone else for an extended period of time! Serioulsy, I think this
> is a lot about nothing. There is no consequence. Simply a lot of
> continuiing hype and fear of radiation perpetuated by those who
> should know better. Scientifically speaking, a waste of everyone's
> effort.
> ------------------------------------
> Sandy Perle
> Vice President, Technical Operations
> Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
> 3300 Hyland Avenue
> Costa Mesa, CA 92626
>
> Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100 Extension 2306
> Fax:(714) 668-3149
>
> E-Mail: sperle@globaldosimetry.com
> E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
>
> Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
> Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.globaldosimetry.com/
>
> ************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
>
>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/