RE: Savannah River site contractor faces fine

["Jim Hardeman" <Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us>]

AMEN BROTHER!



Jim Hardeman

Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us 



>>> "Kent, Michael D." <Michael.Kent@nmcco.com> 4/19/2004 15:24:14 >>>



>Savannah River site contractor faces fine

>The proposed fine against Westinghouse Savannah River Co. is for $206,250.



>"DOE took this action because of the number of personnel protective 

>barriers that were overcome and the potential this had for significant 

>radiation exposure levels to personnel," according to a statement from 

>DOE. Problems were similar to those in an event five years ago, it found.

>the year above 1,500 millirem.



OK, yet another shining example of DOE leadership.  In addition to the fine, how about stopping work and getting another contractor.  Or I don't know, here's a novel idea, get another organization to perform the oversight, let's say the NRC.  



Fox guarding the henhouse, somehow always seems like a conflict of interest.



Just my own thoughts,



Michael D. Kent





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/