Re: Wikman reflects the 'reasonable' response to ICRP disinformation

[maury <maury@webtexas.com>]

And the same processes now are well underway in the revisionist dishonesties

about the health effects of the Chernobyl accident.



Maury Siskel



========================

Muckerheide wrote:



> Friends,

>

> Re the following abstract: Wikman again reflects the consequences of the

> ICRP when it misleads reasonable persons with false claims that, as stated,

> "the Commission assumes that there is a risk of harm even from very low

> doses."

>

> Again, this is the same as the US NRC's old proposal to regulate down to

> levels "below regulatory concern" without acknowledging the voluminous

> science (and physical certainty) that there is (can be) no harm at low

> doses. NRC's proposal was rejected for the same reasons presented by Wikman,



---------  snipped  -----------



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/