[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Al Qaida Nukes in the USA
In my view, if Osama does have a nuke, please use it on the author...he
deserves it.
William Garner
University Of Kentucky
Radiation Safety Department
Lexington KY. 40506-0076
Phone: 323-5795
Fax: 323-4752
http://ehs.uky.edu/radiation/
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu
[mailto:owner-radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu] On Behalf Of jjcohen
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 7:51 PM
To: radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu
Subject: Al Qaida Nukes in the USA
>From the NewsMax Website: http://www.newsmax.com
Breaking from NewsMax.com
A new book written by a former FBI consultant claims that al-Qaeda not
only has obtained nuclear devices, but also likely has them in the U.S.
and will detonate them in the near future. These chilling allegations
appear in "Osama's Revenge: The Next 9/11: What the Media and the
Government Haven't Told You," by Paul L. Williams (Prometheus Books).
<snip>
Williams says his "intelligence" concludes the most likely means of
attack would come in the form of a so-called "suitcase (size) tactical
nuclear bomb."
"The chatter that everyone is referring to is coming from the nest in
Pakistan, a virulent nest in Iran, the chatter is all about nukes being
here....the best bang for the buck is nuclear, they (al-Qaeda) know
that."
Such bombs are estimated to have an explosive strength of approximately
"10 kilotons" and could weigh less than 35 pounds.
"With today's technology and the Internet, an experienced person could
easily assemble such a bomb in his home garage," Williams explained.
A bomb of that strength could easily level Manhattan and spread lethal
radiation throughout the NYC-Metro area says the author. "It (the nuke)
could render Manhattan unlivable for 1,000 years," he estimated.
<snip>
I wonder if the residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki realize that their
cities will still be "unlivable" for another ~950 years? Given the
quality of insight exhibited in his "unlivability" assertion, the
credibility of rest of the information in William's book might also be
considered somewhat questionable.