[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Pakistan to build nuclear plant with China's help
Index:
Pakistan to build nuclear plant with China's help
German minister questions N-plant smokescreen plan
Iran Defies Pressure, Resumes Tests of Nuclear Plant
Nuclear powers unenthusiastic for disarmament: NPT forum head
Work at Los Alamos Nuclear Lab Goes Slowly
---------------------------
Pakistan to build nuclear plant with China's help
ISLAMABAD, July 28 (Reuters) - Pakistan has formally approved
proposals to build a new nuclear power plant with help from longtime
ally China, Finance Minister Shaukat Aziz said on Wednesday.
Aziz, who is expected to become prime minister next month, told state-
run television the new nuclear plant would cost 51 billion rupees
($874 million).
The 300 megawatt plant will be built at Chashma on the banks of the
Indus river, around 280 km (170 miles) south of Islamabad, alongside
the first plant that China helped build in 1999.
An official statement said the project also envisaged the transfer of
technology from China to enable the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission
(PAEC) to run the plant itself.
The project includes a nuclear steam supply system, a turbine
generator and related equipment.
The statement said the project will be completed in seven years but
did not say when it will be started.
PAEC and China's National Nuclear Corporation signed the deal on the
construction of a new nuclear power plant in May.
Pakistan says its new nuclear plant is for peaceful use only.
The country was at the centre of a nuclear proliferation scandal this
year after its top nuclear scientist was found to have been involved
in an illicit trade in nuclear parts.
Pakistan built its first nuclear power station in 1972 in the port
city of Karachi with Canadian help.
But Western countries, under pressure from the United States, later
halted nuclear cooperation with Pakistan amid suspicions Islamabad
was secretly developing nuclear weapons.
Undeterred, Pakistan ran five nuclear tests in May 1998 in a tit-for-
tat response to tests by India.
----------------
German minister questions N-plant smokescreen plan
BERLIN, July 28 (Reuters) - A system to protect German nuclear power
stations from terrorist attacks by surrounding them in a smokescreen
won't be effective enough, Environment Minister Juergen Trittin was
quoted as saying on Wednesday.
German energy firms E.ON , RWE , EnBW and Vattenfall Europe have
asked utilities and arms firm Rheinmetall to supply and build a
defence system to counter attacks that use passenger aircraft.
Trittin told the Financial Times Deutschland newspaper the plan would
help reduce the likelihood of a disaster but more needed to be done.
"The smokescreen plan, in its current form, is not sufficient to
significantly improve the protection of nuclear power plants," he
said. "We have therefore asked state authorities to come up with
improvements."
Countries with nuclear plants worldwide have been investigating how
to protect their reactors from attacks after militants flew planes
into buildings in New York and Washington DC in September 2001.
Some countries have considered installing anti-aircraft missiles at
power plants. Rheinmetall will equip Germany's 18 active nuclear
reactors with smoke machines.
At the touch of a button, the reactors will be enveloped in smoke
within seconds, depriving pilots of visibility. The system, which has
been tested successfully, could be in operation by the end of 2005.
Power companies have declined to give any more details on the system,
however, for fear of diminishing its effectiveness.
Approval from local authorities in the relevant German states must
still be obtained. The companies expect to obtain the go-ahead as
early as this year.
---------------
Iran Defies Pressure, Resumes Tests of Nuclear Plant
VIENNA (July 29) - Iran has defied international pressure and resumed
testing a facility for converting uranium, a key part of the process
of enriching the element for use as fuel or in a nuclear bomb,
diplomats said on Thursday.
The European Union's "big three" -- France, Britain and Germany --
strongly criticized Iran when it tested the site in March, saying it
sent the wrong signal and would make it harder for Tehran to regain
international confidence.
The EU three were due to meet Iranian officials in Paris on Thursday
to discuss Tehran's nuclear program.
The United States says Iran is stringing the international community
along with talks over its nuclear program while buying time to make
an atomic bomb. Iran denies the charge, saying it is only interested
in generating electricity.
While Iran said in April it intended to run the tests at its uranium
conversion facility near the central city of Isfahan, the move snubs
a request by the U.N. nuclear watchdog for it not to test the site.
The testing would produce a small amount of uranium hexafluoride, the
gas which is pumped into centrifuges to obtain enriched uranium, one
western diplomat said.
"They are testing the equipment. As a by-product, some UF6 (uranium
hexafluoride) is produced," he said.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) nuclear watchdog
declined to comment.
Iran promised the EU three in October it would suspend all activities
related to uranium enrichment. But Iran says it still has the right
to produce uranium hexafluoride and build centrifuges. The IAEA says
the suspension was meant to apply to both.
After Iran told the IAEA in April it intended to conduct the tests,
the IAEA governing board passed a resolution in June that "calls on
Iran ... voluntarily to reconsider its decision."
----------------
Nuclear powers unenthusiastic for disarmament: NPT forum head
SAPPORO, July 29 (Kyodo) - Nations possessing nuclear weapons are not
enthusiastic about nuclear disarmament, the designated chairman of a
conference to review the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty said in a
recent interview in expressing concern at their stance ahead of the
meeting.
On the slow progress in elimination of nuclear weapons, Brazilian
Ambassador Sergio de Queiroz Duarte, who will chair the 2005 NPT
Review Conference, said the biggest obstacle is a lack of will on the
part of nuclear powers regarding abolition.
In the interview with Kyodo News in Sapporo where Duarte attended a
four-day U.N. disarmament conference that ended Thursday, he said
there has been no sign of achieving elimination of nuclear weapons
nearly 60 years after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
and the establishment of the United Nations in 1945.
At the previous review conference in 2000, the nuclear powers clearly
committed themselves to the elimination of nuclear weapons.
But nuclear and nonnuclear nations were in conflict at a preparatory
meeting in May for the 2005 NPT conference, as the nuclear powers
rejected a call by nonnuclear nations to come up with specific steps
on the abolition of nuclear arms.
The participants in the preparatory meeting failed to set an agenda
for the 2005 meeting.
Duarte said he will consult with officials of the participating
countries to try to reach a consensus on the agenda, while expressing
hope that Japan will play a constructive role at the conference.
The conference to review the operation of the NPT, which is aimed at
preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and achieving nuclear
disarmament, is held every five years.
------------------
Work at Los Alamos Nuclear Lab Goes Slowly
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) - Some routine administrative tasks are now
getting done at the Los Alamos nuclear weapons lab, but all research
is still on hold while managers figure out how to get a handle on
security.
The process of getting the lab running again after an already two-
week shutdown is proving so complicated that it has taken on a life
of its own. A project manager and staff have been assigned to do
nothing but keep track of what lab activities must be reviewed and
restarted and when, spokesman Kevin Roark said.
Officials at the University of California, which manages the lab,
halted all classified work July 15 after two computer disks
containing classified information were discovered missing. A day
later, lab Director Pete Nanos stopped nearly all work.
Calling it an opportunity for employees to reflect on their
responsibilities and blasting some for not following security rules,
Nanos said the lab would review every department's activities and
recommend restart only when all compliance issues were addressed.
Starting late last week, Roark said the lab resumed some of the
lowest-risk activities - namely administrative office work. The chief
financial officer division was back doing business Wednesday.
"There are a certain number of activities that have been stood up as
of today," Roark said Wednesday.
"We don't have a firm handle on the exact numbers because it's
constantly changing," he said.
On Tuesday, lab spokesman Jim Fallin estimated 10 percent to 20
percent of the lab's low-risk, essential activities, such as
procurement and supply, were ready to resume but hadn't.
Roark said those statements were based on the best information
available at the time, adding lab officials are doing their best to
keep the lab work force and the public well informed while mapping
out the detail-laden process internally.
Members of Congress are watching carefully as the lab works to shore
up security measures, Texas Rep. Joe Barton, chairman of the House
Energy and Commerce Committee, said Wednesday. He was among
congressional and Energy Department officials who visited the lab
last week.
"The Congress is not going to tolerate the lack of security of
classified material at Los Alamos any longer," Barton said.
------------------------------------
Sandy Perle
Senior Vice President, Technical Operations
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
3300 Hyland Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100 Extension 2306
Fax:(714) 668-3149
E-Mail: sperle@dosimetry.com
E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/