Re: Unfortunate Radsafe Response Mechansim

["Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>]

On 18 Dec 2004 at 12:58, jjcohen wrote:



>  I was not aware that there an "official" Radsafe position. 

> Just what is it that the non-believers don't believe in?



Jerry,



I'll re-state. There is no radsafe opinion. What I am referring to 

are those who believe whole-heartedly that there is no such thing as 

"dangerous" radiation, adverse effects from radiation, no 

consequences of any type from exposure to radiation. It is this group 

who then attacks anyone who questions this paradigm.



I also re-state that it is OK to have a dialogue and refute one's 

opinion, hopefully with facts. That is the purpose of Radsafe, to 

allow for exchange of ideas. What I consider wrong is to attack the 

person, just because they have a different opinion, and not simply 

refute the opinion.



I guess that summarizes my point.



Sandy

----------------------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle 

Senior Vice President, Technical Operations 

Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc. 

2652 McGaw Avenue

Irvine, CA 92614



Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306 

Fax:(949) 296-1144



Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/ 

Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/ 



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/