[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Dose conversion factors - ICRP vs. FGR 11 & 12
Bjorn
This is only a hint.
The people who wrote FGR 11 and 12 were the same ones from ORNL who were on
the ICRP Task Group on Internal Dosimetry. I would guess that the results
are "consistant".
John
_________________
John R Johnson, Ph.D.
*****
President, IDIAS, Inc
4535 West 9-Th Ave
Vancouver B. C.
V6R 2E2
(604) 222-9840
idias@interchange.ubc.ca
*****
or most mornings
Consultant in Radiation Protection
TRIUMF
4004 Wesbrook Mall
Vancouver B. C.
V6R 2E2
(604) 222-1047 Ext. 6610
Fax: (604) 222-7309
johnsjr@triumf.ca
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
[mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]On Behalf Of Bjorn Cedervall
Sent: December 20, 2004 5:22 AM
To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: Dose conversion factors - ICRP vs. FGR 11 & 12
Dear Radsafers,
I wonder if there has been any systemic comparison made between the dose
conversion factors of ICRP and those in FGR.
Any hint will be highly appreciated,
Bjorn Cedervall bcradsafers@hotmail.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/