[ RadSafe ] Re: Radiation deficiency remediation

[John Jacobus]

I just wonder where you get the rangeof 1.0 - 10
rem/a.  Is there any basis for this or just an article
of faith because it sounds so convenient.  That is
quite a range of values.

--- jjcohen <jjcohen at prodigy.net> wrote:
> My choice would be a commercially available bottled
> drinking water product
> containing ~ 0.05 mci/l tritiated water (flavored
> varieties would be OK).
> Anyway,
> if one's entire drinking water supply was from this
> product, I figure their
> annual dose
> would be well within the optimal dose range. (1.0 -
> 10.0 rem/a)
> Sometimes, I make math errors, so please check my
> calculation.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jay Caplan <uniqueproducts at comcast.net>
> To: Bernard Cohen <blc+ at pitt.edu>
> Cc: jjcohen <jjcohen at prodigy.net>;
> <radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl>; radsafe
> <radsafe at radlab.nl>; yuan-chi luan
> <nbcsoc at hotmail.com>; <shliu at iner.gov.tw>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Re: Radiation deficiency
> remediation
> 
> 
> Although there is a lot of tritium in gun sights,
> exit signs, etc. isn't it
> all gaseous? There is no commercial source of
> tritiated water that consumers
> could access, is there?
> Jay Caplan
>   ----- Original Message -----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing
> list
> radsafe at radlab.nl
> 
> For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and
> other settings visit: 
> http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
> 

+++++++++++++++++++
"Embarrassed, obscure and feeble sentences are generally, if not always, the result of embarrassed, obscure and feeble thought."
Hugh Blair, 1783

-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com