[ RadSafe ] Re: First Ever Intentional Hormetic X-Ray
BLHamrick at aol.com
BLHamrick at aol.com
Fri Apr 22 03:08:15 CEST 2005
In a message dated 4/20/2005 5:59:27 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
crispy_bird at yahoo.com writes:
Recently,
you have EPA requiring remedication to 25 mrem annual
exposure limits. From the most serious hazards to the
truely trivial.
Actually, EPA's proposed guideline was 15 millirem per year, some years ago.
That position has been rescinded, and they tend to bristle (in my opinion)
at any use of dose as a criterion for remediation. The official message now
is that risk, not dose is the appropriate measure for remedial actions
(although how you get any risk without dose is beyond me). CERCLA regulations
recommend remaining within the risk range of 1E-6 to 1E-4 increased cancer risk
over a lifetime, or in very generic terms (which the EPA also has pooh-poohed)
about 0.05 to 5.0 millirem per year.
Barbara L. Hamrick
More information about the radsafe
mailing list