[ RadSafe ] Residential Lung Cancer Study
Tom Mohaupt
tom.mohaupt at wright.edu
Fri Mar 4 20:43:14 CET 2005
I've finally gotten a copy of the Residential Radon and Risk of Lung
Cancer article form Epidemiology (Vol. 16, no. 2, March 2005, pag. 137)
Table 2 has radon concentration ranges, number of cases and controls in
each range, and calculated odds ratios stratified by sex, age, duration
of smoking, number of cigarettes smoked per day, number of residences,
and years with alpha-track measurements in the exposure time window.
Here's a summary Table 2, plus my calculation of simple ratios between
the cases and controls
[(n/3662)/(N/4966)]:
Radon Conc. No. of Cases No. of Controls Odds
Ratio Simple Ratio
(Bq/m^3) (n = 3662) (N = 4966)
<25 832 934
1.0 1.21
25-49 1021 1432
1.13 0.967
50-74 669 1052
1.09 0.862
75-99 349 501
1.16 0.945
100-149 450 569
1.24 1.07
150-199 163 228
1.22 0.969
>= 200 178 250
1.37 0.966
It looks to me that "sex, age, duration of smoking, number of cigarettes
smoked per day, number of residences, and years with alpha-track
measurements in the exposure time window" have a significant impact on
the data, perhaps more so than radon.
Also, 50% of the cases lived where the radon concentration was less than
50 Bq/m^3.
and 78% of the cases lived where the radon concentration was less than
100 Bq/m^3.
and 90.7% of the cases lived where the radon concentration was less
than 150 Bq/m^3 (this is the EPA action level).
Interesting.
Have a good weekend.
Tom
--
Thomas Mohaupt, M.S., CHP
Radiation Safety Officer
Wright State University
937-775-2169
tom.mohaupt at wright.edu
More information about the radsafe
mailing list