[ RadSafe ] Re: IAEA published a safety report No 24 on Communication planning

Tue Mar 22 05:28:19 CET 2005

Dear Friend,

Thank you for the observation, in fact we were among the consultants, both
scientists and communication specialists, to drafting and review of this
document. This is complementary to the TECDOC IAEA 1076. The TECDOC IAEA
1076 is more generic and of large amplitude. The Safety Reports Series 24,
Communication Planning by the Nuclear Regulatory Body,
describes good practices and gives practical examples of how the regulatory
body can establish a systematic and structured programme for enhancing
effective communication with various parties and under various
circumstances.
Interested colleagues also can download this document at
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1135_scr.pdf

In fact, the first document on this issue was written 10 years ago,
unfortunable not available to download.
Nuclear Communications: A Handbook for Guiding Good Communication Practices
at Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities, December 1994.

Best Regards

Jose

----- Original Message -----
From: <ksparth at vsnl.com>
To: "Jose Julio Rozental" <joseroze at netvision.net.il>
Cc: "Flanigan, Floyd" <Floyd.Flanigan at nmcco.com>; "John Jacobus"
<crispy_bird at yahoo.com>; "radsafe" <radsafe at radlab.nl>;
<know_nukes at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:59 AM
Subject: IAEA published a safety report No 24 on Communication planning

>
> Dear Radsafers,
>
> IAEA published a safety report titled "Communication planning by the
nuclear regulatory body", safety report series No 24 in 2002.Twenty four
scientists and communication specialists from different parts of the world
contributed to the drafting amd review of this document.
>
> The report describes good practices and gives practical examples of how
the regulatory body can establish a systematic and structured programme for
enhancing effective communication with various parties under various
circumstances.
>
> Regards
>
> K.S.Parthasarathy
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jose Julio Rozental <joseroze at netvision.net.il>
> Date: Friday, March 18, 2005 10:27 pm
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Nuclear power plants; radiological bombs not on
topoflist of attacks
>
> > The unique IAEA text specific on Communication was written to be
> > addressedto several types of public.
> > Communication on Nuclear, Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety: A
> > PracticalHandbook
> > IAEA TECDOC Series No.  1076, 1999
> > The interested collegues can download it at
> > http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1076_prn.pdf
> >
> > This publication is intended for national regulatory authorities,
> > to provide
> > them with
> > guidance on the principles and methods that can be applied in
> > communicatingnuclear safety
> > to different audiences under different circumstances.
> >
> > The key questions addressed in this publication are: what
> > communicationshould seek
> > to achieve; what to communicate, to whom, when and how; and how to
> > knowwhether
> > communication is succeeding, this will differ depending on the
> > audience and
> > circumstances.
> >
> > I have worked in this document as IAEA Consultant and I had
> > suggested to
> > IAEA at that time, to use it as basis for International training
> > course of 2
> > extensive weeks. It is really a pity that the idea didn't follow
> > ahead.
> > About the topic above - different audiences under different
> > circumstances. -
> > Who among the colleagues of this list had the opportunity to talk to
> > deaf-dumb and blind people on nuclear issues? - Especially emergency
> > response?
> > Believe me it is a fantastic experience
> >
> > Jose Julio Rozental
> > joseroze at netvision.net.il
> > Israel
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Flanigan, Floyd" <Floyd.Flanigan at nmcco.com>
> > To: "John Jacobus" <crispy_bird at yahoo.com>; "Jose Julio Rozental"
> > <joseroze at netvision.net.il>; "radsafe" <radsafe at radlab.nl>;
> > <know_nukes at yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 5:43 PM
> > Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Nuclear power plants; radiological bombs
> > not on top
> > oflist of attacks
> >
> >
> > > Publish the work and get it into the hands of FEMA and other public
> > information groups.
> > >
> > > Floyd W.Flanigan B.S.Nuc.H.P.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Jacobus [crispy_bird at yahoo.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 3:40 PM
> > > To: Flanigan, Floyd; Jose Julio Rozental; radsafe;
> > > know_nukes at yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Nuclear power plants; radiological
> > bombs not on
> > > top oflist of attacks
> > >
> > >
> > > And how would you get it into the hands of the public?
> > >
> > > --- "Flanigan, Floyd" <Floyd.Flanigan at nmcco.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jose,
> > > > The issue of psychological impact of such an event
> > > > definitely needs to be addressed. Being both an
> > > > author and a degreed radiation protection
> > > > professional, perhaps I should write an
> > > > informational book which would explain in layman's
> > > > terms the reality of radiation and it's associated
> > > > effects according to the true data at hand. My
> > > > belief is that the lack of education on the m
> > >
> > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > > "A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it
> > will annoy
> > > enough people to make it worth the effort." Herm Albright
> > >
> > > -- John
> > > John Jacobus, MS
> > > Certified Health Physicist
> > > e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Make Yahoo! your home page
> > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
> > radsafe at radlab.nl
> >
> > For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings
> > visit:
> > http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
> >
>
>