[ RadSafe ] Re: Uranium Burning
James Salsman
james at bovik.org
Mon May 9 20:43:57 CEST 2005
According to the phase diagrams in the Gmelin Handbook and other
references for the oxidation of metallic uranium, depending on
the burning temperature, the expected combustion products are about
20% UO2, 60% U3O8, and 20% UO3. The pyrophoric uranium munitions
safety studies done thus far have been using mechanical separators
and filters incapable of collecting particles smaller than 0.05
micron in diameter, and have reported 25% UO2 and 75% U3O8 only.
Sincerely,
James Salsman
alstonchris at netscape.net wrote:
> Folks
>
> I'm loath to get involved in this, being not remotely a chemist, but, U3O8 is yellowcake, isn't it? I thought that the thread had to with the burning of depleted U metallic projectiles and/or shielding. Please advise.
>
> Cheers
> cja
>
>
> James Salsman <james at bovik.org> wrote:
>
>>Franz,
>>
>>Thank you for your comments:
>>
>>
>>>... Uranium Trioxide is a solid compound
>>
>>From J. Ackermann, R.J. Thorn, C. Alexander, and M. Tetenbaum,
>>in "Free Energies of Formation of Gaseous Uranium, Molybdenum,
>>and Tungsten Trioxides," Journal of Physical Chemistry,
>>vol. 64 (1960) pp. 350-355: "gaseous monomeric uranium
>>trioxide is the principal species produced by the reaction of
>>U3O8 with oxygen" (at 1200 Kelvin and above.)
>>
>>Are you suggesting that a uranium fire doesn't reach 1200
>>Kelvin, or something else?
>>
>>
>>>... dispersion (I never read something similarly ridiculous
>>>as he claimes’!!!!)
>>
>>What do you find ridiculous about my description of dispersion?
>>
>>
>>>... he cites papers as a confirmation of his absurd comments,
>>>which clearly state a totally different result
>>
>>To what are you referring?
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>James Salsman
More information about the radsafe
mailing list