[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rumbles



> Date:          Thu, 16 Feb 95 13:30:03 -0600
> Reply-to:      radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
> From:          Free Spirit <FRANK@rover.bsd.uchicago.edu>
> To:            Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
> Subject:       Re: Rumbles

> >I think you're right! Its finally the sound of digging in of heels as the
> >obvious waste of massive national resources in the name of environmental
> >protection, and more importantly public health and safety! especially while
> >not funding many very important environmental and public health and safety
> >matters that really cause human injury and disease,
>
>     Well, not really. However the only organization that deliberately
>     exposed many citizens to large scale levels of radiation seems to
>     be the Government, in the name of "seeing how quickly soldiers can
>     recover from a tactical Nuke," etc.
>
>     It's not that I'm against working to reduce exposure to radiation,
>     it's just that I don't like having the fox in charge of protecting
>     the henhouse.

You would be well advised to get a handle on the size of the
henhouse, before you start designating foxes.>
Russ
cmeyer@brc1.tdh.texas.gov
(512)834-6688