[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: occupational doses and restricted areas
Kenneth,
In reference to your Point #1 below.
It is a "somewhat common" practice for veterinarians to have
a "patient's" owner (if necessary) hold the animal for x-rays as
the intermittent/infrequent exposure of/to the owner would not
"statistically" effect their lifetime probability for any
radiation induced effects. IMHO, this is certainly not the case
for a (I assume unbadged) nurse who holds patients on a
"routine/even occasional" basis. I would definitely consider the
circumstances you describe to be an "occupational" exposure.
Point #2
The key point here is what percentage of the allowable dose
are these personnel "liable" to receive, i.e. >10%?? Are the
observers radiation workers or general public. If a mix, you'll
have to take the lower amount, of course. Prudence is the word
that best describes visitors/observers, I think...
Joel Baumbaugh (Baumbaug@nosc.mil)
NRaD
San Diego CA (the left coast)
Normal Disclaimers DO apply - The Navy and I seldom agree on
anything (I'm jesting)
Date: Fri, 12 May 95 09:53:59 -0500
Sender: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
From: "Douglass, Kenneth Harmon" <KENDOUG@WVNVM.WVNET.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: occupational doses and restricted areas
I have been following the discussion of occupational exposures
and
restricted areas with some interest. We have had a couple of
related questions here:
1) A radiologist was telling nurses that if they held patients
during xrays, they were subject to the dose limits for general
public since they are not "radiation workers". I reread the state
regs and concluded that this is clearly an "occupational
exposure".
Do you agree?
2) A more serious question has to do with the stress lab in
Cardiology where injections of Tc-99m Cardiolite are performed.
Should observers be allowed in the room and should they be badged
or 'trained' in some way? What dose limits apply?