[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NRC requirements on retention of film
I'll make a futile stab at this request. I would assume that the only
requirements are that the records be maintained and not the specific
film. I say that because if one utilizes a TLD for dose of record,
once the TLD is read, the TLD loses all of the associated parameters
that led to the exposure and subsequent does assigned. It is true that
the NRC in 10 CFR Part 20 requires that personnel monitoring records
be maintained for the life of the license. For survey results it is
only 3 years. The American Nuclear Insurers (ANI) requires that all
power plants maintain records for life of plant + 10 years (this goes
beyond NRC requirements).
I for one believe that it is prudent to maintain all records and any
other pertinent information when it comes to radiation records. They
can help you but on the other hand, they could harm you, based on what
the records state. It is again a business decision. I believe the more
information you have, especially after some time has passed, the
better able you will be to reconstruct the assignment of a dose of
record.
Sandy Perle
Supervisor Health Physics
sandy_perle@email.fpl.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: NRC requirements on retention of film
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at Internet-Mail
Date: 8/21/95 9:53 AM
We at DOE are involved in discussions with National Archives on the recommended
retention times for processed film (not the recorded results from). Would
appreciate hearing from NRC licensees about any specifics incorporated into
licenses or technical specifications. All I could find in Part 20 was in
20.2106(f) which requires maintaining records of individual monitoring
results until the Commission terminates the license requiring the record.
However, it doesn't specifically reference processed file.