Re[2]: RADSAFE Format

["Rima, Steven D" <SDRIMA@saix367.sandia.gov>]

I agree with Sue, HOWEVER, I, (and many others) do not get the sender's email 
address unless it is in the body of the message, as Sue and I have done. This 
has been discussed before on RADSAFE, with no resolution. Because of the variety
of email software out there, many of us have no option but to reply globally 
because we do not get the individual's address. Will everyone PLEASE append your
name and email address, as a minimum, to your messages for those of us that do 
not get it otherwise? It would be a great help!

****************************************************
Steven D. Rima, CHP
sdrima@sandia.gov
Standard disclaimer stuff...
****************************************************

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: RADSAFE Format
Author:  radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at CCSMTP
Date:    9/18/95 9:36 AM


To all of us in the RADSAFE space:
     
When messages that are not of earth-shaking general interest come through, such 
as the one from Mr. Montgomery asking about how to get his message though to 
everyone, perhaps you might consider replying directly to the writer rather 
than sending an automatic reply that's generally broadcast.  I'd rather see the 
person who sent the message get a bunch of replies than see all of us have to 
wade through several not-so-relevant replies.
     
Please accept my apologies, Mr. Montgomery - I'm not upset with you, or even 
upset with anyone.  This is however not the first time that this kind of situ- 
ation has arisen, and we should all use common sense when we consider where 
replies to any message should go.  If you think all common sense has deserted 
me, let me know directly.
     
Regards,
Sue Dupre/Health Physicist/Princeton University 
dupre@princeton.edu