[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Anecdotes
- To: SMTP PMDFADDR <MAILGATE@ADDRMELON.CA.BOEING.COM>
- Subject: Anecdotes
- From: Bruce Pickett <SHEA136@KGV2.bems.boeing.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 10:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
- Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 0
- Importance: normal
- Mr-Received: by mta MELON; Relayed; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 10:06:26 -0700
- Priority: normal
- Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 10:22:40 -0800
- Resent-From: SHEA136@KGV2.bems.boeing.com
- Resent-Message-Id: <9511201829.AA19419@atc.boeing.com>
- Resent-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Ua-Content-Id: Anecdotes
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;MRP$20NOV199510003195]
In 1979, while still a graduate student, I became the health physicist (read
that as the entire radiation safety department) for a research lab located
across the street from my university (but not part of the university). Two
incidents from that time stick in my mind.
(1) Approximately 6 months prior to my taking over as the facility HP, there
had been a tritium contamination incident. The gas chromatograph (GC) in one
ofthe labs had a tritium impregnated foil. The exhaust line from the GC went
to a room exhaust duct and SOP required that the fan for that duct be manually
turned on whenever using the GC (the duct fan switch was conveniently located
next to the GC). One morning, the researcher started using the GC, but forgot
to turn on the fan switch. He worked in the lab for about eight hours with no
ventilation of the tritium offgas from the GC. The then current HP somehow
became aware of the situation (I'm not sure exactly how) and conducted a
contamination survey using wipes and counting them in a liquid scintillation
counter. The HP found tritium contamination throughout the GC lab, down the
corridors of one wing of the building and into several adjoining labs.
Urinalysis of the researchers showed positive tritium results, with the
original researcher having about 10% of the maximum permissible body burden.
The labs and corridor were isolated for about a week while the HP
decontaminated the facilities. But given the nature of tritium, it tended to
"hide" in cracks and crevices, so that even after all areas had been cleaned,
tritium continued to creep out of its hiding places. Even six months later,
when I became the HP, I was still finding tritium now and then in unexpected
places. Daily contamination surveys and quarterly urinalyses for the
researchers resulted from this incident.
(2) Tritium and carbon-14 were the only isotopes used by the researchers at
the facility. In one lab, the researchers were doing environmental uptake
studies in ecosystems using various C-14 labelled compounds. To check for
airborne C-14, we would run a particulate air sampler all day long in this
room, then count it on a gas flow proportional counter (GFPC) the following
morning. Before going home at the end of each day, the HP (me) was supposed to
turn off the air sampler and change the filter paper so that it was ready to
start up the next day. One day, I forgot to turn off the air sampler and it
continued to run overnight. The following morning when I discovered this, I
said "oops!" and changed the filter and went to count it. To my horror, my
GFPC was registering thousands of counts per minute, and my immediate reaction
was that we'd had a leak of C-14 in the lab. I recounted the filter paper
using a thin absorber and the count rate went to zero, thus confirming in my
mind that I was witnessing a low-energy beta emitter on the filter (the
facility had no alpha-emitting isotopes). I immediately evacuated the
researchers from that lab and isolated it. I reported this to the facility's
RSO (more or less a figurehead, he was a senior researcher with little rad
safety experience), and he went off to convene the radiation safety committee.
I contacted the senior HP for the university radiation center across the
street and explained what had occurred, and his first question was "Did you
take into account the radon daughters?" Again I said "oops!" and went back to
recount my filter. I found that the activity on this filter decayed with an
apparent half-life of about 35-45 minutes. Also, by adjusting the GFPC
voltage, I found that the materials on the filter were principally
alpha-emitters. Since this was at a time before all the furor surrounding
household radon, radon and its progeny up till then had only been an
interesting note in my textbooks; the realization that radon was real and
measurable came as a hard-won lesson for a budding HP, and I've never
forgotten about it since. Following my realization of my faux pas, I went back
to the lab and released it from isolation and explained to the researchers
what had happened; they all laughed and went back to work. I then went to the
RSO to inform him of everything, and he told me that the members of the
radiation safety committee were upset because I had isolated the lab without
their consent. I told the RSO that it was ridiculous to expect me to get a
committee consensus when, at the time, there appeared to be a real threat to
the safety of the workers. Well, he went back to the committee and appraised
them of the facts. The next day the RSO called me into his office to say that
the committee was now upset with me because I had released the lab from
isolation without their approval, even though there had not actually been a
problem. So out of this I learned two lessons: (1) remember radon, and (2)
committees, much like packs of wolves, have a need to mark their territory, so
they tend to urinate on things a lot.
Bruce Pickett
The Boeing Company, Seattle WA
shea136@kgv2.bems.boeing.com
"You and I travel to the beat of a different drum."
- Linda Ronstadt