[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: dose-effect estimates vs privacy
We in the commercial nuclear power world are fortunate in that we do
have complete radiation histories for the majority of our workers. We
do NOT have other radiation exposure data, such as medical or
environmental exposure. In those cases where we are made aware of a
medical procedure, we can assume an estimated exposure, however, this
data is not included in the ALARA review prior to assigning a job
function. As Al suggested, this information would be of interest,
however I am not advocating that we embark on an epidemiological
nightmare. This has been suggested many times before, but the cost of
the study, balanced against not being able to capture other causes of
disease, would make the results questionable at best. The NRC has
considered this study, as well as further reduction of the regulatory
dose limits, but has elected not to at this time. WHY? Because the
older workforce, the group that has received the highest exposures
during the past several decades, had either passed on, or, have been
retiring. That means the current workforce for the most part is young,
and one that has a smaller manrem, collectively and individually.
Since the regulatory limit has been reduced, and, the licensees have
reduced their administrative limits even further, there doesn't appear
to be a real need to conduct this exhaustive epidemiological study. I
for one hope that it doesn't occur in my working life!
Sandy Perle
Supervisor Health Physics
Florida Power and Light Company
Nuclear Division
(407) 694-4219 Office
(407) 694-3706 Fax
sandy_perle@email.fpl.com
HomePage: http://www.lookup.com/homepages/54398/home.html
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: dose-effect estimates vs privacy
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at Internet-Mail
Date: 11/27/95 4:45 PM