[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re[2]: Dose vs Regs cont'd
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: Re[2]: Dose vs Regs cont'd
- From: Kent Edwards <EDWARDSRK1@padvx2.a1.ornl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 11:50:00 -0500 (EST)
- A1-Type: MAIL
- Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 2
- Importance: normal
- Mr-Received: by mta PADVX2; Relayed; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 12:18:51 -0500
- Mr-Received: by mta OAX; Relayed; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 12:18:01 -0500
- Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 12:14:00 -0500 (EST)
- Priority: normal
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;15812103115991/1014834@PADVX2]
The phase "Speed Kills" is catchy and has been used by law enforcement for
years and in a way it may be partially true. But is it pure speed that kills
or a byproduct of it, vehicle density?
The statistical probability of having a two car collision is exactly the same
whether the speed is 55 or 65 if only one car is on the road. The probability
will of course increase as the vehicle density increases. If two structurally
identical highways with the same destination had speed limits of 55 and 65
which one would be worn out first? Most probably 65 mph would.
I do not know whether or not "traffic fatality" data is normalized to traffic
density but it probably is not since the stats are given in raw numbers and
not as rates. The point is that data can be used to say anything the purveyor
wants it to. Be weary, keep that analytical edge.
Kent Edwards
Ditto all disclaimers