[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re:
From: "Webb, Jim" <jwebb@health.ohio.gov>
Fellow Radsafers
We were reviewing environmental water sample data that was analyzed
for Iso U and Iso Pu. It was learned that the sample contained no
preservatives and the samples had sat in the laboratory for 15 days
before being analyzed.
We would like to know if you would reject or accept the data. A brief
explanation for your answers would be appreciated.
JWEBB@HEALTH.OHIO.GOV
We too have been wrestling with concern about a " wall effect" --
ions in solution plating out on the inner surface of a container.
Our lab has usually insisted on acidification of the sample with
nitric acid to a pH of 2. When pressed the lab indicated that the
sample could be acidified when brought back to the office, as long as
it sat for around 48 hours before being tested. I contacted the EPA
labs and inquired how samples were handled there, pointing out that
samples which were acidified with nitric acid could not legally be
transported by commercial aircraft. They indicated that they did not
acidify samples which they took to their lab. Several questions
which have arisen out of our experiences are as follows:
1. Does a sample which is to be analyzed for certain metals have to
be acidified as soon as possible after being taken?
2. If you can wait until you return to your main office, but still
have to acidify the sample, how long must it sit before you can rely
on the ions being returned to solution?
3. Does the materials of construction of the container, have any
effect on whether or not ions will plate out? We use polyethylene
cubitainers nowadays.
4. Will insoluble oxides behave like soluble salts and exhibit the "
wall effect " phenomenon? Or more to the point does the " wall
effect" truly exist, and should we be concerned with sample
acidification for that purpose?
5. Is there literature on sampling procedures, which give guidance
on sample prep in the field specifically for radionuclides which take
chemical reactions into account? I remember back in the '50's some
discussion in the literature regarding the " wall effect" but can
find nothing about it now. Could I be using the wrong terminology?
***************************************
Russ Meyer
Internet: cmeyer@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us
tel: 512/834-6688
fax: 512/834-6654
***************************************