[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
17H Packaging
- To: BlindCopyReceiver:;@compuserve.com
- Subject: 17H Packaging
- From: "Roy A. Parker" <70472.711@CompuServe.COM>
- Date: 29 May 96 19:53:48 EDT
Let's put this thread in context. We are talking about 17H and 1A2
drums as the basis for DOT 7A Type A packages
If you have qualified a DOT 17H drum as a DOT 7A Type A package then it
remains a DOT 7A Type A package as long as you meet all the parameters
in your required documentation.
If you have a 1A2 drum then it must be qualified in your documentation
as a DOT 7A Type A package. This may be as simple as documenting in
your Type A package documentation the structural equivalency between the
17H and 1A2 drums for your application.
The UN uniform classification and packaging standards, use after
October 1, 1996, and acceptance by a waste contractor is not relevant
when we are talking solely about a DOT 7A Type A package.
Roy A. Parker, Ph.D.
Radiation Physics Consultant to
Federal Express Corporation
E-Mail: 70472.711@compuserve.com
Tel: 504-924-1473
-------------( Forwarded computer archived letter follows )-------------
One of the consequences of the UN uniform classification and packaging
standards:
If you have old DOT 17H drums that have not been tested and MARKED per
those standards (POP - performance oriented packaging), you can use
those drums until October 1, 1996 - after that your waste contractor
cannot accept them.
The UN nomenclature looks like this ---> UN 1H2/X340/S/94/USA.
There's a lot of info on the subject, however, there was a good one-page
synopsis written in the New Pig Tech catalog not too long ago. I
believe Lab Safety Supply has put information out in their catalog as
well.
I can fax the New Pig Tech article to those interested.
Regards,
-Erick Lindstrom
Erick Lindstrom
Radiation Safety Officer
309 Montana Hall
Montana State University
Bozeman, MT 59717-0244
Phone: (406) 994-2108
Fax: (406) 994-4792
avrel@gemini.oscs.montana.edu