[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Radiation and Lawsiuts - Summary
- To: " - (052)radsafe(a)romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu"<radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Radiation and Lawsiuts - Summary
- From: MVala@USCCMAIL.uscc.bms.com
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 1996 08:00:27 -0500
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 (22)
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [/PRMD=BRIMYSQ/ADMD=MARK400/C=US/;0004700005892985000002]
- X400-Originator: MVala@USCCMAIL.uscc.bms.com
- X400-Recipients: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
I missed the original thread, so i couldn't comment in time for your
summary report.
I work for a large by-product licensee that has manufactured and
distributed radioactive products for over thirty years. According to the
facility manager, every retired employee who later contracted any form of
cancer has filed a lawsuit against the facility. My role is to supply the
dosimetry records for these cases. I am not informed of the resolution but
I believe most are settled out of court. All of these cases involved doses
that were within the regulatory limits. According to the Industrial
Hygiene people, the chemical side of the facility has many similar cases
for chemical exposure. We are a large corporation with deep pockets, these
types of lawsuits are becoming more common and the rate of new suits always
increase after a lay off.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Radiation and Lawsiuts - Summary
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at Internet/X400
Date: 7/1/96 4:34 PM
This posting fulfills my promise to summarize responses to my inquiry about
lawsuits against hospitals or colleges in which someone claimed a
radiation-related injury. No on identified a single case. Several people
referred me to the RPM article discussing the Whiting v. Pilgrim decision.
(Basically, victims cannot introduce a speculative reconstruction of dose
where a dosimetry system is in place unless they can show errors in the
measurements and/or system.)
Regards,
Dave Scherer