[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dose Rates from Patients -Reply -Reply
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am suprised by the numbers below - by calculation:
Dose rate = specific gamma ray constant * Activity / distance ^2
= 2.2 (R/h)(cm^2/mCi) * 175 mCi / (100 cm)^2
= 40 mR/h
This does not include shielding provided by the patient, so the actual
measured value should be significantly less depending on the patient's
size.
Also, since the measurements are taken immediately after administration,
neck and whole body uptakes are NOT a factor. The capsules or liquid
would still be in the stomach and thus be close to a point source.
Perhaps the instrument used was a GM meter calibrated to Cs-137 in
which case it would over-respond to the lower energy I-131 gamma's.
Connie Ketarkus wrote:
> Dose of 131-I given: Initial dose-rate: (one meter from anterior
> chest/neck)
> 142mCi 76mRem/hour
> 145mCi 70mRem/hour
> 54mCi 25mR/hr
> 144mCi 75mR/hr
> 142mCi 70mR/hr
> 142mCi 80mR/hr
> 187mCi 80mR/hr
> 118mCi 60mR/hr
> 96mCi 50mR/hr
> 96mCi 60mR/hr
> 188mCi 135mR/hr
> 125mCi 65mR/hr
> 100mCi 70mR/hr
> > you get the idea . . . . . each patient is different. their initial exposure
> rate depends on their size (fat, skinny,
> tall, short) and, most importantly, their neck and whole-body uptakes.
> > note, these are *initial* exposure rates, and these fall very rapidly,
usually
> to less than + in the first
> 24 hours due to urinary excretion.
--
Kent Lambert, CHP lambert@allegheny.edu
All opinions are well reasoned and insightful.
Needless to say, they are not [necessarily] the opinions of my employer. -
paraphrased from Michael Feldman
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
The graph in the Rad Health Handbook and the literature on certain G-M
meters, suggest the overresponse should be only about 40% for iodine
relative to cesium (taking the correction factor to be 1.7 for iodine and 1.2
for cesium). Unless the G-M meter in