[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UF6

To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: UF6
From: Ccja@aol.com
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 23:38:02 -0400

If the daughters he's talking about are protactinium-234 and thorium-234, I
would think that they could easily be decayed-in-storage. Actually, even if
they're not the above two (I can't tell if it's U238 or 235 we're talking
about, except that since we don't make plutonium anymore, I wouldn't think
it'd be U238), the fact that they ingrow so quickly suggests short halflives,
doesn't it? Sorry that I don't have decay tables handy.

Chris Alston

Prev by Date: Re: UF6
Next by Date: Health Physicist position available (2nd posting)
Prev by thread: Re: UF6
Next by thread: Re: UF6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread