Re: ICRP 68 Dose Models

[Casper Sun <casper@bnl.gov>]

Stephen :
I would not surprise that there are problems for ICRP Publication 68
because of ICRU, Nuclear Medicine peoples, in general do not care for
the current ICRP's absorbed dose definition.  Anyways, you are asking an
interesting question.  Casper
=============================================================    

McGuire wrote:
> 
> I was wondering if the ICRP 68 dose models and dose conversion factors for
> worker intakes of radionuclides are being accepted as technically valid or if people
> were having problems with the results for some particular radionuclides?
> 
> I seem to remember that there was some of criticism for some radionuclides, but I
> cannot remember exactly what I heard.  Does anyone have any information on this?
> 
> Stephen A. McGuire
> sam2@nrc.gov