[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UNITS

To: netmailer radsafe <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: UNITS
From: Bruce Busby <bbusby@umich.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:24:16 -0400 (edt)
In-Reply-To: <9609261452.AA07946@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>


Hi,

It was always explained to me that uuCi is less likely to be
mis-understood/confused over the sound powered phones (and announcing
systems) than pCi  (pico, micro, micro-micro, zero, bozo, etc)


Bruce


On Thu, 26 Sep 1996, Kevin Rolfe wrote:

> 
>      Not to add more fuel to an already out of control fire, but, /100cm2 
>      was not a difficult concept.  Now whether this came from Rickovers 
>      world or not I don't know but the USN uses uuci/100cm2 for 
>      contamination levels and does not recognize pci/100cm2
>

Prev by Date: Re: Technical basis for 100 cm^2
Next by Date: Re: Technical basis for 100 cm^2
Prev by thread: RE: UNITS
Next by thread: RE: aquous I-125 disposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread