Re[2]: Cellular Phones and EPDs

["Eric L. Darois" <daroiel@naesco.com>]

     It is my understanding that the Seimens EPD is quite sensitive to RF.  
     Any contacts at Calvert Cliffs NPP may have more info because they 
     have invested in this device.
     
     The MG EPD (DMC100) is designed and tested against RF interference and 
     has not given us any problems.  The older version (DMC90) had some 
     sensitivity to RF, however the manufacturer has a backfit to resolve 
     this problem.
     
     I am not familiar with other EPDs
     
     Eric Darois
     Seabrook Station
     daroiel@naesco.com


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Cellular Phones and EPDs
Author:  radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu at Internet
Date:    10/24/96 6:10 PM


>Radsafers:
>
>I just discovered that ...
     
Unfortunately I don't have any data to contribute on this subject. However, 
given the widespread use of cell phones, I am very interested in seeing the 
data likely to emerge on the subject. I suspect very strongly that any 
organization using electronic dosimeters would be similarly interested.
     
Accordingly, I'd like to ask the Radsafe community planning to respond on
this topic to respond to Radsafe (or "cc" Radsafe) so we can all see the data.
     
Thank you.
     
Bob Flood
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
(415) 926-3793     bflood@slac.stanford.edu
Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are mine alone.