[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Radiation monitoring badges in cine/floro exams
David,
Your arguments are correct. However, one should recognize that many
of the regulations promulgated by the various states are still based
on NRC regulations. For example, much of the Suggested State
Regulations (SSRs) published by the Conference of Radiation Control
Program Directors (CRCPD) comes from regulators working in Agreement
States. As such, they much prefer to use similar standards for the
general case when possible (and adjusting them when needed). So 10
CFR 20 and NRC position papers are often a good starting point to how
the states may regulate "other" forms of ionizing radiation.
Wes
> Date sent: Thu, 7 Nov 96 10:53:02 -0600
> Send reply to: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
> From: David W Lee <lee_david_w@lanl.gov>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
> Subject: Re: Radiation monitoring badges in cine/floro exams
> But it is also important to point out that NRC rules do not apply to
> virtually all U.S. cine/fluoro environments which normally use x-ray
> machines which the NRC is not authorized to regulate! Thus, within the
> non-NRC x-ray world, the issue still remains. It is the NRC's lack of
> regulatory authority in this arena that has forced the Agreement States to
> try to compensate and fill this regulatory gap. The State of Texas, as one
> Agreement State example, has made a good effort in this respect. It is
> probably inappropriate to try to follow NRC dosimeter placement guidance in
> areas where the NRC, itself, has no regulatory authority. For example, in
> the NRC-world, most users of radioactive material do not wear lead aprons.
*********************************************************************
Wesley M. Dunn, CHP 512-834-6688
Deputy Director, Licensing 512-834-6690 (fax)
(Texas) Bureau of Radiation Control wdunn@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us
*********************************************************************