Re: 86Rb bigger issue - OPINION

["baumbaug@nosc.mil" <baumbaug@nosc.mil>]

        Carol,

        I was one of the responders to the Rb-86 question, AND I included a
disclaimer.

        I work for the federal government (Navy).  Unless I am at home, I
use a government computer and am working on government time when I access
radsafe.   The short disclaimer I included was for two reasons:

  #1, I am not an official mouthpiece of the Federal Government and my
"opinions" are MINE not Uncle Sams.  

  #2 Many people in the Arms Forces receive radsafe.  In case anyone in the
Navy (a "bigwig") takes offence at an answer I post, I want to make sure
that any "opinion" I give on this or any other listserver is understood to
be from "me" and not an opinion of the federal government or the Navy.  - I
get enough "flack" from people on the net.

        I "assume" that others feel the same...


        Joel


 But to start talking about the LEGAL IMPLICATIONS of
>offering an opinion, advice or information on the listserver...We might as well
>all cancel our subscriptions.
>
>Carol Lentz
>Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research
>lentzc@aa.wl.com
>
>
>
Joel T. Baumbaugh (baumbaug@nosc.mil)
Naval Research and Development (NRaD)
San Diego, CA., U.S.A.