[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Scenarios
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re[2]: Scenarios
- From: Peter.Darnell%EM@em.doe.gov
- Date: 25 Nov 96 16:26:00 -0500
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*USDOE;c\em\961125163718e
- P1-Recipient: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Ua-Content-Id: Re[2]: S
- X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*USDOE; arrival 961125162600-0500 deferred 961125162600-0500 action Relayed
Message authorized by:
: chdst4+@pitt.edu_at_INTERNET at X400PO
Why don't you attach your scenarios to your e-mail or copy them via
ASCII into the body of your e-mail instead of faxing. Then we call
all review/comment at our leisure.
Pete Darnell
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Scenarios
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu_at_INTERNET at X400PO
Date: 11/25/96 3:04 PM
Errors-To: melissa@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Originator: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Precedence: bulk
X-Listserver-Version: 6.0 -- UNIX ListServer by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Radiation Safety Distribution List
Dear Folks,
I am a graduate HP student who is designing a computer program
that aids in the performing radiological risk assessments. I have written
several scenarios of possible radiological events. These scenarios
are to be given to RCOs, and then the human results will be checked
against the computer results. My question to any one who is interested is
what do you think of these scenarios and do you think they are realistic
from the standpoint of daily radiation work? I have the education, but not
the experience to answer such a question. I'd fax a few of these sceanrios
to anyone who is interested enough to review them. Thank you.
-Christopher Dixon
University of Pittsburgh