Re: Part 33 proposal -Reply -Reply

["Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@ix.netcom.com>]

Charles Willis is correct, and this method is also quite visible 
where state lotterys were approved with the "promises" that the 
profits would be used to supplement school funding, not replace 
existing funding. That was a sham as well. Governmental agencies 
should be provided with the necessary funding to accomplish their 
directives. The NRC, for the most part, does a very good job with the 
funding and personnel they have. I had only a few cases where I 
believed that the NRC had overstepped their authority (in the 
inspection area) while at FPL for 21+ years. In those cases, where a 
specific inspector went awry, the Region always acted in the 
appropriate manner, based on the regualtory criteria available to 
them. Hopefully regulatory agencies can benefit from fees and fines 
collected to improve their visibility and surveillance which is most 
definitely needed.

Sandy Perle
Director, Technical Operations
ICN Dosimetry Division
Office: (800) 548-5100 Ext. 2306 
Fax: (714) 668-3149

E-Mail: sandyfl@ix.netcom.com    

Homepages:

http://www.netcom.com/~sandyfl/home.html
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205