[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re[2]: NY Times article
On Fri, 20 Dec 1996, Steven Rima wrote:
> I guess the Fort Collins Coloradoan is a little behind; President
> Clinton officially announced this morning that he is nominating Pena
> for Secretary of Energy.
>
> Steve Rima
> steve.rima@doegjpo.com
>
You are correct. Crow doesn't taste so bad, its the feathers! We could
do worse, however, than Pena, if he is a strong leader as Clinton
claims. The same can't be said for Watkins or O'leary. Both effectively
sold out DOE, in my opinion, of course.
Les Fraley
Colorado State University
les@lamar.colostate.edu
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
> Subject: Re: NY Times article
> Author: Les Fraley <les@lamar.ColoState.EDU> at Internet
> Date: 12/20/96 10:34 AM
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Dec 1996, Alden Tschaeche wrote:
>
> > Stuart.Altman@dp.doe.gov wrote:
> >
> > > Perhaps this is why our new Sectretary of Energy is the present Secretary of
> > >
> > > Transporation...only joking...(?)
> >
> > This is no joke. It is a catastrophe for DOE. Think of the Denver
> > Airport that Pena built. He knows essentially nothing about the nuclear
> > industry. I think we should do everything possible to convince the
> > Senate that he is not the man for the job. Of course this is only my
> > opinion. Melissa, this does bear on radsafe insofar as it is related to
> > USA radsafer's jobs. Al Tschaeche xat@inel.gov
> >
> According the today's edition of the Fort Collins Coloradoan, Pena will
> not be nominated for the DOE position, instead Elizabeth Moler, a Federal
> Energy Regulatory Commission member will be nominated. Besides, I happen
> to like DIA - its orders of magnitude better than Stapleton!
> Les Fraley
> Colorado State University
> les@lamar.colostate.edu
>