[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Biological Effects of Low Dose and Low Dose Rate Radiation
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF LOW DOSE AND LOW DOSE RATE RADIATION
open to the public without charge at the Rennaissance Hotel and the
Washington Convention Center, Washington DC Monday April 21, 1997 8:00
-10:30 a.m.
This session is sponsored by Physics and Society Forum of the American
Physical Society. The session is part of the joint meeting of the APS/AAPT
April 18-21.
The session will be moderated by John Cameron
SPEAKERS: (25 minutes + 5 minutes discussion)
Art Upton: Biological Effects of Low-Level Ionizing Radiation: A Critical
Reappraisal
Ludwig Feinendegen: The sum of different microdose-effects in irradiated
tissue contradicts the linear-no-threshold hypothesis.
Myron Pollycove: The Rise and Fall of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Theory
of Radiation Carcinogenesis
Dan Strom: The Use and Abuse of Models in Radiation Risk Management
PNNL-SA-28600
----------------------------- My Abstract (same as for PEP this summer):
Uses and Abuses of Models in Radiation Risk Management
Daniel J. Strom, Health Protection Department, Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352; dj_strom@pnl.gov
Abstract -- "All models are wrong, and some are useful" (George E.P.
Box, 1979). A variety of scientific models are used to relate
biological insult (such as exposure to microbes, chemicals, and energy
fields) to various health endpoints. Such models (as distinct from
theories and hypotheses) play an important role in the risk assessments
that are used in risk management. This course provides an overview of
the kinds of health effects that can be quantified and modeled, and then
describes models commonly used in relating effects of ionizing radiation
to various measurable or "model-able" quantities. Because there are no
human data to use as input to models in many important cases, the bases
for extrapolation are discussed. The "weight of evidence" for various
molecular, cellular, tissue, and organism studies must be determined.
In this context recent publications on the Japanese survivors of nuclear
bombings, eleven cohorts of underground miners, and meta-analyses of
indoor-radon case-control studies are presented, along with a review of
BEIR VI. Stephen L. Brown defines three distinct uses of risk
assessment models as prevention (or protection), prediction, and
priority-setting. The best choice of model depends on its intended use
and also on non-scientific considerations in risk management.
Appropriate and inappropriate uses of the linear, no-threshold model are
illustrated.