[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cellular Effects of NIR
> I am looking for references on studies which have shown "changes" in
> cells exposed to NIR at power densities well below exposure
> standards, particularly recent ones (if any).
You really should specify what kind of NIR, and what level of reliability,
because this is a broad question.
Restricting myself to effects that have been independently replicated:
Optical frequencies: You can get organism-level effects well below safety
standards (e.g., vision; thermal sensing of IR).
RF/MW: I do not know of anything below ANSI/IEEE C95.1 levels except possibly
the old Blackman et al studies on calcium efflux done with ELF-modulated RF.
Power-frequency: If you accept the ICNIRP 24-hr public exposure guideline of
100 microT, the reported effects on ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) might
qualify, but that's about it. If you go with the NRPB-UK level of 1330
microT, then the ODC effects would qualify, as would some of the reported
effects on intracellular calcium. There is also the Liburdy et al report that
a 1.2 microT field can reverse melatonin-inhibition of breast cancer cell
growth (but I'm not sure that this can be considered independently replicated)
Static fields: You can get effects on magneto-tactic bacterial and on some
insects at well below safety standards.
------------------------------------
John Moulder (jmoulder@its.mcw.edu)
Maintainer: Powerlines & Cancer FAQs,
Static EM Fields and Cancer FAQs
Cell Phone Antennas & Health FAQ
USENET: sci.med.physics, sci.answers, news.answers.
http://www.mcw.edu/gcrc/cop.html/