[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: New Jersey school incident
Rick Edwards stated the following:
> If there was someone at fault (and from the perspective of the haz-mat
> team, I'm not sure there was), it was the team's Public Information
> Officer. Perhaps someone should point out to the PIO the kind of damage
> a news release of this nature could cause.
I agree with Rick's assertion. However, let me also point out that
the PIOs are knowedgeable regarding radiation risks as to how much
training they have had, and by whom. My experiences with the PIOs in
Florida are that they are well trained in the basic hazards that
affect the public, but are weak in radiation risks associated with
either power reactors or other nuclear releases. One of my
accountabilies while at FPL was "technical expert" and worked with
the federal, state and local agencies during press briefings, be it
emergency exercises or actual incidents. This was part of the
Emergency Response Organization. Again, the PIOs were good at
relaying information to the public, but their expertise in radiation
related matters was very lacking. They relied heavily on the utility,
in the case of an incident there, real or practice. I would bet that
most states are in the same predicament. Hurricanes, chemical spills,
tornados .. they are terrific, but a release of radiation, gaseous or
otherwise, I wouldn't count on them to mollify the public.
------------------
Sandy Perle
Technical Director
ICN Dosimetry Division
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Office: (800) 548-5100 x2306
Fax: (714) 668-3149
mailto:sandyfl@ix.netcom.com
mailto:sperle@icnpharm.com
Personal Homepages:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205 (primary)
http://www.netcom.com/~sandyfl/home.html (secondary)
"The object of opening the mind as of opening
the mouth is to close it again on something solid"
- G. K. Chesterton -