[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Acceptable P-32 monitoring methods
We had an accident here back in the 80s in which a minute
jet of P-32 shot out of a unexpectedly pressurized bottle and
contaminated much of the clothing of a researcher. The researcher
did not realize he had been contaminated and did not immediately
survey himself. By the time the contamination was discovered six hours
later, he had accumulated enough of a skin dose to exceed NRC dose
limits. I don't think this kind of incident would be readily
detected with wipes, and I have a hard time imagining that we would
approve the use of P-32 in a lab that did not have G-M survey meters
on hand.
Regards,
Sue M. Dupre, Health Physicist
Office of Occupational Health and Safety
Chemical Sciences Building/Forrestal Campus
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ 08544-0710
E-mail: dupre@princeton.edu
Phone: (609) 258-6252
Fax: (609) 258-1804
Visit the OHS Web site at http://www.princeton.edu/~ehs
- Follow-Ups:
- No Subject
- From: "Janine F. Katanic" <katanicj@ucs.orst.edu>