[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Vibration Test
Obviously, the best way to certify the vibration test is to do it. This is
expensive, however, so other means are often used, such as: "engineering
judgment" and previous experience with similar packages.
Your question regarding whether a "UN" package is acceptable cannot be
answered without additional information. There is a common confusion in
thinking that the "package" is limited to the "packaging." In fact, the
package includes both the packaging and the contents. What's acceptable for
one type of contents (eg., feathers) may not be acceptable for another (eg.,
rocks). Packages that are certified for solids are often unacceptable for
liquids. It is necessary to review the packaging tests and determine whether
the intended contents are similar to the contents for which the package was
tested.
General purpose, UN certified packagings are available from commercial
suppliers, such as (no endorsement implied): Air Sea Atlanta (404-351-8600)
or Hazmatpac (1-800-923-9123). Your contents must be within the scope of the
contents for which the packaging is certified and you must pack the material
according to the vendor procedures for the certifications to be valid.
There is also a book of DOT packaging test results available: DOE/RL-96-57,
"Test and Evaluation Document for the U.S. DOT Specification 7A Type A
Packaging." This can be viewed at the Web site, URL:
http://www.hanford.gov/pss/t&p/dot7a/ptoc.htm
The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
Here's to a risk free world, and other fantasies.
Bill Lipton
liptonw@detroitedison.com
Mr. Lipton wrote:
"It is not necessary to perform this test, but the package must be
capable of passing this test, if performed."
How then, would you be able to demonstrate compliance? Someone said
that using "UN" boxes would suffice, but what would that demonstrate
about the "package"? How are other people resolving the vibration test
requirement?