[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
X-ray Scanning For Theft Detection
With regards to this subject, the reference is somewhat dated,
but:
"The [ICRP] Commission has been asked for its views on an
international proposal to use radiography as part of a system for
the security-screening of airline passengers. This envisages that
a small proportion of passengers might be examined
radiographically, using 'specially developed techniques'
[italicized in the original text] that would restrict the exposure
to 1 milliroentgen or less in any part of the body, to be used
only when other methods have indicated the presence of unexplained
objects on the passenger. Such passengers would be given the
choice between an X-ray examination and a body search. The
Commission has already recommended that the irradiation of persons
for non-medical purposes, such as in anti-crime and customs
examinations, is generally to be deprecated. However, in view of
the grave risks involved in the seizure of aircraft, the
Commission believes that the proposal, if performed under the
conditions already specified, could be justified in the light of
the benefits that might be expected." HPS Journal, Vol. 21, p.
616, 1971.
This reference indicates that the Commission had already
considered anti-crime activities, but it gives no reference.
Somebody may be able to point us towards it, or an update of
either of these statements.
The only question that I would still have is whether the
Commission's decisions depend upon who the receptor is - a member
of the public, or an employee. One could argue that for an
employee, the irradiation is a condition of employment, and
therefore is elective, similar to other radiological workers. I
don't propose this as a resolution of the issue, but only to pose
the question.
Doug Minnema, CHP
Defense Programs
US Department of Energy
<Douglas.Minnema@dp.doe.gov>
______________________________ Forward Header
__________________________________
Subject: X-ray Scanning For Theft Detection
Author: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu_at_internet at x400PO
Date: 9/22/97 7:16 AM
I am very interested in the Health Physics Community comments re the
routine scanning of persons for diamond theft detection (administering a
free air dose at the skin surface position of around 15 =B5Gy /scan at 30=
0
scans per year). The ethics of this practice may be of prime importance.
<snip>
<Zero length text item>