[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: unuseful dental x-ray
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (IPM Return requested), SPenning@aol.com (IPM Return requested)
- Subject: Re[2]: unuseful dental x-ray
- From: Kim D Merritt <kdmerri@sandia.gov>
- Date: 28 Oct 1997 14:22:45 -0700
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; 054A2345657A58E4-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: kdmerri@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 28 Oct 1997 14:22:45 -0700
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 28 Oct 1997 14:22:45 -0700
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
Remember though that the picture could be of anybody's mouth. An
x-ray would uniquely identify your mouth. Not that I think that this
is a good practice.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: unuseful dental x-ray
Author: SPenning@aol.com at hubsmtp
Date: 10/28/97 2:04 PM
I would have refused having the exam and found a new dentist if the dentist
couldn't give me a better explanation. If he truly needed such evidence, I
would think a photograph would have served the same purpose.