[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Airport Dosimetry -Reply

To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: Airport Dosimetry -Reply
From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 18:05:26 -0800
Comments: Authenticated sender is <sandyfl@popd.ix.netcom.com>
In-reply-to: <s4733485.051@nrcsmtp.nrc.gov>
Priority: normal
Reply-to: sandyfl@ix.netcom.com

As Harold states below, and as I noted earlier when I was informed 
that my answer was for a different question ( a totally different 
animal all together), I am going to sit in the corner...  Please hold 
my reply incase a question regarding airport X-RAY units is ever 
asked ;)

> Sandy, my information indicates that the TLDs should have registered a response, if
> ran through, say, an SAIC explosive detector system, since they would have been
> exposed to the gamma and neutron flux (~8e5 n/cm2) from the approximately 250
> micrograms of californium in the system.
> 

HomePage:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205

References:
- Re: Airport Dosimetry -Reply
  - From: Harold Chaney <HDC@nrc.gov>

Prev by Date: Re: Airport Dosimetry
Next by Date: Re: Varian ECDs
Prev by thread: Re: Airport Dosimetry -Reply
Next by thread: Re: Airport Dosimetry -Reply
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread