Re: Byproduct vs. Accelerator Produced Materials -Reply

[carol marcus <csmarcus@ucla.edu>]

At 06:04 PM 1/7/98 -0600, you wrote:
>        Reply to:   RE>Byproduct vs. Accelerator Produced Materials -Reply
>
>Hi RadSafers,
>
>Sorry, but I couldn't resist this...
>
>Hopefully, someday  the Atomic Energy Act will be changed to follow the
recommendations of the IOM!   %^)
>
>See W.R. Hendee's comment on page 5 of the January 1998 HPS Newsletter!
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
>Michael J. Bohan, RSO   |  e-mail: mike.bohan@yale.edu
>Yale-New Haven Hospital |    Tele: (203) 785-2950
>Radiological Physics    |     FAX: (203) 737-4252
>20 York St. - WWW 204   |    As usual, everything I say may be plausibly
>New Haven, CT    06504  |    denied at my employer's convenience ...
>><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>
>Dear Mike:

Stop "hoping".  If you want it to happen, we have to make it happen.  First
start by calling Bill Strauss and Jim Fletcher and ask them why it isn,t
happening.  I have not been able to convince the last few presidents of SNM
and ACNP that we should do this.  They just sit there getting lied to and
don't really seem to understand what's happening.  At the Las Vegas meeting,
I am putting it to the House of Delegates.  Either we vote for freedom or
for slavery.  We'll see how people respond, but why not pitch in and try to
influence the vote?  What started off as a partnership process to write a
risk-based new Part 35 is obviously a lie, a fraud, and a trap.

Ciao, Carol
>