[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Radon Control During Remediation
Bates--
You shouldn't have much of a radon problem with the DU since the progenitor
of the radon (226-radium) has been chemically removed before the uranium
was processed (the reason that mill tailings are such a problem with
radon). The nearest parent isotope left after the chemical processing is
234-U which is mostly stripped away in the gaseous diffusion process (goes
with the enriched uranium). The remaining 234-U (~0.2%) has a long enough
half-life (~250,000 yrs.) to preclude the ingrowth of daughters below 234-U.
Your primary radon problem will probably be with the Colorado soil.
Jerry
At 09:28 AM 1/8/98 -0600, you wrote:
> Hello Radsafers;
>
> Rocky Flats will shortly begin remediation of an area known as
> Trench 1 (T1) where ~125 drums of depleted uranium (DU) chips
> and lathe coolant were buried from 1954 until 1962.
>
> The work will involve excavating the drums and stabilizing the
> potentially pyrophoric DU, in place. All work will be
> performed inside a very large tent to be constructed over the
> site.
>
> My question concerns the generation of Radon and decay
> products from the DU (primarily U238) during the work. Are
> there any regulatory drivers, etc. to require monitoring
> worker exposure to the Radon products, as would be the case in
> a uranium mine, since the Radon is being generated from
> man-made materials?
>
> We intend to air-sample and monitor (with CAMs) for uranium.
>
> Thanks for any input Radsafers might have.
>
> Bates Estabrooks
> bates.estabrooks@rfets.gov
>
*******************************************
Jerry Hunt, CHP
Office of Radiation Protection
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
P.O. Box 2008
Bldg. 4500-S, MS-6099
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6099
Ph.-(423)576-5117, Mailto:huntjb@ornl.gov
*******************************************