[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: New Steve Wing Study
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (IPM Return requested)
- Subject: Re[2]: New Steve Wing Study
- From: Charles Potter <capotte@sandia.gov>
- Date: 04 Feb 1998 09:28:10 -0700
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; 056BB34D8971AA8C-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: capotte@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 04 Feb 1998 09:28:10 -0700
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 04 Feb 1998 09:28:10 -0700
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
The best evidence of this contention is that many epidemiological
studies seem to invent their own units at the outset (or perhaps the
units are invented later to support their agenda).
"You are meant to play the ball as it lies, a fact that may help to
touch on your objective approach to life" -- Grantland Rice
C. A. Gus Potter, CHP
Sandia National Laboratories
Radiation Protection Internal Dosimetry Program
(505) 844-2750
capotte@sandia.gov
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: New Steve Wing Study
Author: sandyfl@ix.netcom.com at hubsmtp
Date: 2/4/98 8:49 AM
Jim Muckerheide said the following:
> Why is there so little shock and concern about what is happening to science
> and integrity, with so little reaction? Has the cadre of competent scientists
> that once made up the labs and DOE/gov't-funded programs been reduced through
> attrition to a few supporters of the 'any radiation is harmful' philosophy?
> though I suppose there may be concern about negative reactions from DOE to
> taking contrary positions?
The above supports my contention the other day that "most"
epidemiological studies are inherently evil, in that they
"manufacture" the results that support their agenda. The outcome is
that very few will accept the results of any study, except as
follows:
1. If you have the same agenda, you will agree, and promote the
findings.
2. If your desired results aren't supported, you will not accept, and
go out and take pock shots at the study.
The data contained within the report is only for show, and in the
end, is rendered meaningless.
------------------
Sandy Perle
Technical Director
ICN Dosimetry Division
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Office: (800) 548-5100 x2306
Fax: (714) 668-3111
sandyfl@ix.netcom.com
sperle@icnpharm.com
ICN Dosimetry Website:
http://www.dosimetry.com
Personal Homepage:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205
"The object of opening the mind, as of opening
the mouth, is to close it again on something solid"
- G. K. Chesterton -